News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med... by figassis on Friday November 13, 2026 @10:00AM (#50484535)
What's suspicious about this is not whether it may or may not be possible (it likely isn't), it's that he is using it to borrow money now, that is not collectible in the case of a default. You get a huge exit because you overpromise today, and when it turns out you aren't a prophet, those that trusted you cannot be made whole.

People and the law keeps treating this as "just a sales pitch", but it's really theft in disguise and should come with evidence on an S1 filing.

Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med... by credit_guy on Friday November 13, 2026 @10:09AM (#50484670)
What do you mean it’s not collectible in case of default? Are you under the impression that money that you borrow before the IPO is excluded from the bancruptcy claims?
Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med... by skeeter2020 on Friday November 13, 2026 @10:21AM (#50484855)
>> Are you under the impression that money that you borrow before the IPO is excluded from the bancruptcy claims?

it's being "borrowed" in the sense that there's an implicit promise as part of the IPO sales pitch, but shareholders are last in line to collect in case of something as extreme as a bankruptcy - and that's if there is anything left if that was to happen, which by definition is not frequent.

Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med... by nradov on Friday November 13, 2026 @10:46AM (#50485206)
Yes, everyone purchasing equity understands that they're last in line after debt holders. This isn't some kind of secret.
Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med... by bagacrap on Friday November 13, 2026 @10:41AM (#50485129)
Obviously borrow is being used loosely here -- it's actually equity. And second, yes, some creditors don't get their money back in a bankruptcy.
Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med... by s_dev on Friday November 13, 2026 @10:09AM (#50484672)
>because you overpromise today, and when it turns out you aren't a prophet, those that trusted you cannot be made whole.

Why are these people obligated to trust Amodei? Why are these people obligate to hand Anthropic money?

I really hate this "Investors should be protected from losses" narrative you see pop up now and again like that isn't the entire natural order on how we conduct these things.

Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med... by compass_copium on Friday November 13, 2026 @11:09AM (#50485587)
I sure hope no major indices bend or break the rules about including <s>bubble stocks</s> freshly IPOd companies in them, since my entire prospects of retirement are tied up in those indices being relatively stable!
Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med... by figassis on Friday November 13, 2026 @12:18PM (#50486590)
I really hate this "Investors should be protected from losses" narrative - right, we should also retire the SEC and every investor protection law and regulation, because what where we thinking?
Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med... by vonneumannstan on Friday November 13, 2026 @10:16AM (#50484765)
It never was, the vast majority was VC investment not debt so collection was never on the table...
Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med... by _DeadFred_ on Friday November 13, 2026 @10:41AM (#50485138)
So a variation on the Chamath Palihapitiya 'SPAC' method?
Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med... by DrewADesign on Friday November 13, 2026 @10:50AM (#50485279)
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: nobody pulling the strings in this industry gives a shit about anybody, or really anything other than increasing their available capital. They’re powered by some combination of greed, inertia, and religious fervor. Their primary role is to groom investor sentiment and the weak job market means they needn’t feign benevolence to recruit competitively. This is the purest expression of post-.com era SV culture I’ve witnessed since I started in tech nearly 30 years ago.
Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med... by AndrewKemendo on Friday November 13, 2026 @11:15AM (#50485664)
> nobody pulling the strings in this industry gives a shit about anybody, or really anything other than increasing their available capital

This is true for every industry, group, non-profit etc…there are no organizations not fully captured by monetary transactions and hoarding capital.

Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med... by DrewADesign on Friday November 13, 2026 @12:43PM (#50486992)
Absolutely false. I’m not young, and I’ve worked in many different industries. Once you get away from for-profit businesses controlled by third party investors, that could not be further from the truth. Having monetary motives doesn’t mean you only have monetary motives, or lack willingness to address your industry’s ecosystem, employees, and the communities you touch. Believe it or not, some people that run companies have pride, ethics, and red lines they will not violate to pump up their valuation. I left software because considering anything other than money is anathema to its business culture. I’ve worked extensively with people in arms manufacturing and even they are more motivated by business ethics than anybody I’ve encountered from the SV software scene in a fucking decade. For an industry that was started by people that wanted to make money by solving people’s problems using innovation and cutting edge tooling, this is a pretty pathetic state of affairs.
Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med... by AndrewKemendo on Friday November 13, 2026 @01:04PM (#50487324)
I was a military officer for 17 years, the only thing that matters is your unit/wing/program office is your budget. The only thing more important is readiness and guess what the main thing that effects…your budget

I’ve run mutual aid cooperatives and whatever you try to do will be overrun by private equity and your market will be closed and the people who show up will be flighty and noncommittal

I currently am ED for a non-profit that I will not allow to be used for profit making - almost 100% of the people who ask to volunteer or show up do it for their own promotion or to jumpstart their product it’s maddening the number of times I have to say no.

I am the founder of the 150,000 person ultramarathon subreddit and I’ve only found two (2) moderators in the last 15 years that aren’t trying to promote something for money.

There are no organizations that escape this because at the root level you can’t find more than a literal handful of people who aren’t in it for the money - even if thats not their direct reason it’s usually a secondary reason

Even “monks” go out and write books and buy fancy cars

There doesn’t exist in my daily survey of social organizations ANY, and I mean there isn’t any single organization, that does what it says it does without trying to make a profit in some way.

Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med... by DrewADesign on Friday November 13, 2026 @05:12PM (#50490707)
> I’ve run mutual aid cooperatives and whatever you try to do will be overrun by private equity and your market will be closed and the people who show up will be flighty and noncommittal

… yeah

> Even “monks” go out and write books and buy fancy cars

You are a bitter, cynical edge lord that only sees the worst in the best people. Ironically, I’ll bet you think you’re the most rational observer you know.

How you are describing the world you see says a lot more about the way you see than it says about the world. Later.

Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med... by vitro on Friday November 13, 2026 @12:48PM (#50487075)
There are people who genuinely want to help others because they realize it is the right thing to do. Also applies to organizations governed by such people.
Re:Eli Lilly CEO pushes back on Dario Amodei's ludicrous med... by AndrewKemendo on Friday November 13, 2026 @01:20PM (#50487547)
I used to take my truck to Larry Roberts of Roberts auto. He’s a neighbor and friend and did oil changes and basic stuff. Larry closed up shop cause he can’t work on modern cars and doesn’t have the tools or staff to handle anything more than basics for cars older than the 00s.

Larry is great but he’s not even relevant to the discussion because you might as well be describing a DIY or hobby shop.

None of the people or organizations you describe are relevant to how the world works, they are temporary outliers with limited impact for a brief period

Even then, Larry didn’t work for free and wasn’t running it out of the goodness of his heart. He did it for money

The only people I know doing shit that isn’t for money are the people that actively work on the trails that I walk on in Northern Virginia and guess what, they work on them so they can have nice trails not because somebody else is going to use the trail.