That takes the cake, I personally avoid anything Apple posted. There is much cult (and personality cult) involved it doesn't makes for any sensible discussion
My understanding was the Megaspeed sales weren’t classified as sales to China. Nvidia circumvented those requirements.
You mean the BIS revision that allowed NVIDIA to do this? https://www.nytimes.com/2026/11/07/business/economy/nvidia-c...
I stand by what I said. If selling to China were like selling to any other non-restricted country, moving $7.5B of product through this particular shell company wouldn't be so shocking.
I also said that this was a small problem compared to the much larger potential problem of him having shared sensitive information with a Chinese spy. It takes a long time for leaks to surface; it is fair to assume that this MIGHT have happened given the romantic relationship that developed.
NVIDIA is licensed by the United States government to sell GPUs to China, and they do so at a rate well under their licensed quantity.
Read up on 91 CFR 1684 which directly contradicts your claims.
Your most important argument is categorically false and completely unresearched.
Your subsequent claims also have no basis: you cite a bunch of cases in which people leaked sensitive information as equivalent to the Jensen case, where the affair was with the CEO of a customer they were legally selling product to, and where we have no evidence that any leaks occurred.