A year after the 100% AI mandate nobody understands our code

Re:A year after the 100% AI mandate nobody understands our code by tasuki on Monday November 09, 2026 @06:12PM (#50433696)

> Pangram said

I wish people stopped posting what Pangram said. Pangram set an impossible task before them — either they're grifters or naive. They use a magic box to determine whether someone else used a magic box, giving you a bullshit result.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A year after the 100% AI mandate nobody understands our code by tayo42 on Monday November 09, 2026 @06:15PM (#50433735)

You can take a bunch of clues and decide if its a post worth engaging with. It did say 100%, and there's other clues that make it seem like bot spam.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A year after the 100% AI mandate nobody understands our code by c23gooey on Monday November 09, 2026 @06:46PM (#50434044)

What stops someone from writing a prompt that includes: "run your response through Pangram and keep adjusting until it thinks it was written by a human"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A year after the 100% AI mandate nobody understands our code by poszlem on Monday November 09, 2026 @07:32PM (#50434499)

Time? Money? The tool is still good enough if it can detect the 99% of people who won't do that.

[ Parent | on HN ]