Re:Our Smallest, Most Efficient Model: Muse Ember
by cheesecompiler on Monday November 09, 2026 @03:03PM
(#50431112)
Kind of burnt out on all the model updates at this point.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Our Smallest, Most Efficient Model: Muse Ember
by Pedro_Ribeiro on Monday November 09, 2026 @03:14PM
(#50431301)
Thanks, in that case why not just not comment instead of adding more noise to the discussion?
Re:Our Smallest, Most Efficient Model: Muse Ember
by mgdev on Monday November 09, 2026 @03:15PM
(#50431319)
Please. Complaints are the last thing that we have humans have.
Re:Our Smallest, Most Efficient Model: Muse Ember
by cheesecompiler on Monday November 09, 2026 @04:05PM
(#50432120)
Sorry but why is my reaction "noise"? It's legitimate to be overwhelmed by the amount of released updates and being unable to tell the difference between them.
Re:Our Smallest, Most Efficient Model: Muse Ember
by groggo on Monday November 09, 2026 @04:10PM
(#50432203)
"Government announces AI ban to avoid further cheesecompiler burnout".
haha just kidding. I agree. That's what benchmarks are for. Just keeping a rough understanding of what companies have which models, and understanding general trends of capabilities, economics, and performance of models.
Re:Our Smallest, Most Efficient Model: Muse Ember
by PaulKeeble on Monday November 09, 2026 @03:37PM
(#50431700)
Its a full time job to keep up with them all and assess their value in your own work at the moment. Just so many models coming out.
Re:Our Smallest, Most Efficient Model: Muse Ember
by dingaling911 on Monday November 09, 2026 @04:22PM
(#50432368)
If your current model is doing fine, why do you need to look at anything new?