News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by agent_turtle on Sunday November 08, 2026 @09:39PM (#50420329)
> because AI is inevitable.

is anyone else weirded out by folks chanting this like a mantra? imagine saying this for any other emergent tech. "NFTs are inevitable", "crypto is inevitable", "excel is inevitable", etc.

inevitability != usefulness/profitability

Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by echelon on Sunday November 08, 2026 @09:44PM (#50420369)
NFTs and crypto had little broad use.

Excel was and is inevitable.

AI is going to let me do your job and barely lift a finger. Therefore, inevitable.

Thermodynamically favored outcomes.

Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by krupan on Sunday November 08, 2026 @09:45PM (#50420375)
Yes, you are not alone. It's a religious-like ferver that is downright disturbing.
Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by echelon on Sunday November 08, 2026 @09:49PM (#50420406)
I can do the work of a thousand people. Of course I'm fucking excited.

If this is your sentiment, I'm going to run circles around you. I probably already am.

This is literally the most exciting technology of my lifetime.

I've been a professional software engineer for 15 years. I've written more lines of code in the last three days than my entire career pre-AI.

If you're not excited, I don't know how else to break it to you. Everything you've ever built one person with AI will eventually build for themselves. Quickly. Probably better.

I don't see how y'all don't see this and obsess over it.

Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by card_zero on Sunday November 08, 2026 @09:52PM (#50420430)
I'd better join you while you run around in circles, otherwise I'll be left behind.
Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by EA-3167 on Sunday November 08, 2026 @09:52PM (#50420427)
It’s nice that you’re excited about automating your job, best of luck.
Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by echelon on Sunday November 08, 2026 @10:08PM (#50420547)
I don't exist to have a job.

I want to bend the universe. Maybe that's the difference.

Living the same way we did in the 2010s until retirement seems boring as hell. That was the depressing reality. This is way more fun.

I learned programming to do this stuff. Programming was the necessary evil. Now it's gone and I'm 1000x faster.

Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by californical on Monday November 09, 2026 @01:04AM (#50421637)
> I want to bend the universe

I want to live a life that makes the people I love happy, makes me feel healthy, and hopefully learn some cool things and skills along the way.

Bending the universe sounds predatory, like exerting what you want onto other people without thinking about what they want

Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by echelon on Monday November 09, 2026 @08:16AM (#50425186)
Y'all love to project nefarious things. Breaking things is what scientists and artists do.

I'm starting to hate hacker news. You're all bleak and depressed angry people.

Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by EA-3167 on Monday November 09, 2026 @02:20PM (#50430332)
I’m sure it’ll work out just the way you imagine.
Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by krupan on Sunday November 08, 2026 @09:59PM (#50420475)
We're trolling at this point. Do not feed
Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by kazinator on Sunday November 08, 2026 @10:00PM (#50420483)
[delayed]
Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by echelon on Sunday November 08, 2026 @10:25PM (#50420674)
Do you say that to yourself every time you stream music?

What about the labor you steal from the milkmen, butter churners, seamstresses, and elevator operators? How evil of you.

And yeah, I did it. Not you. That money would be in your bank account if you did it. But you didn't.

I. Personally. Did. It.

It's funny how I'm working around the clock using AI. Because you seem to say this isn't work. And yet I've never been so busy. So can you tell me what's going on here?

How did I manage to build so many useful things for people?

I've had over 40 million downloads of my app recently. Maybe you should think about how people value things instead of your own value system. Your priors might be flawed.

Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by bosshawg on Sunday November 08, 2026 @11:12PM (#50420988)
LOL what's your app then, i'm ready to see some laugh my ass off todo list AI frame work thing you've come up with from the depths of your psychosis, if you even have the guts to post and not just make some deflection excuse .
Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by lelanthran on Monday November 09, 2026 @04:19AM (#50423138)
It's the broken alternative to photoshop.
Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by echelon on Monday November 09, 2026 @08:47AM (#50425543)
I am so sick of this attitude of downplaying AI and calling its users psychotic.

A literal alien technology landed in our laps and you're calling me crazy.

Why are you directing your hate at me instead of trying to figure out how to use the new technology?

You're going to wake up one day and suddenly the entire world will have moved on from your comfort zone.

Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by bosshawg on Monday November 09, 2026 @09:36AM (#50426233)
Boss it would have been easier to just link me to your github.

I read a bit your post history, you're worse than youtube ad clickbait - you never say what you do, just flowery and bombastic language about how great whatever your vague thing is. (Thank you to sibling poster who spilled the beans, see its not too hard, just say " i made a photoshop clone" its less words than what you typed. )

And boss, I was born out of my comfort zone and never really found one, so you don't scare me one drop.

Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by kazinator on Monday November 09, 2026 @12:17AM (#50421357)
[delayed]
Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by krapp on Monday November 09, 2026 @05:27AM (#50423684)
> And yeah, I did it. Not you. That money would be in your bank account if you did it. But you didn't.

> I personally make these things. I'm not ashamed in the least to say it, because it's true.

Weird. At the very least I thought you had thousands of contributors. I guess it's a good thing you're the one getting paid since apparently you're the only one who matters. Wild that you're so invested in AI when apparently it doesn't apparently do any of the work either.

Maybe you should stop jerking off on HN and get to fixing the 2k+ issues on the photoshop clone you "one-shotted" a month ago. Maybe update the prompt to say "pretty please don't make any mistakes."

The way your half-assed broken slop is taking attention away from actual, functional open source projects is a crime.

Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by echelon on Monday November 09, 2026 @08:58AM (#50425697)
Please stop being so toxic. Why is it that you always harass me on HN?

> Weird. At the very least I thought you had thousands of contributors.

We do, and they're awesome.

The paid app I built prior to the Craft apps got to millions in revenue off of my work. Although an anti-AI person like you would say that wasn't my work and that it the revenue just created itself.

> I guess it's a good thing you're the one getting paid since apparently you're the only one who matters.

We're going to build open source infrastructure and weights, and we'll need to earn money to subsidize the build out.

> Wild that you're so invested in AI when apparently it doesn't apparently do any of the work either.

I'm working harder than I've ever worked in my life. You anti-AI people don't understand this because you don't try.

> The way your half-assed broken slop is taking attention away from actual, functional open source projects is a crime.

We are open source, and we're working on adapting open source to the software factory era.

Software factories are the future, and engineers steer the factories.

Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by krapp on Monday November 09, 2026 @02:38PM (#50430697)
I'm not harassing you, I certainly don't "always" harass you.

I am criticizing you, and I'm far from the only person doing so.

If your ego can't allow you to see a difference between the two - and your comments suggest it can't - that isn't my problem.

>We do, and they're awesome.

Cool. So you admit you didn't personally, entirely, as a "solo engineer" do it all. That at least is something.

>Although an anti-AI person like you would say that wasn't my work and that it the revenue just created itself.

OK so we're just arguing with strawmen now I guess. Fair enough, it's my fault for engaging. I should know what I'm getting into.

>We're going to build open source infrastructure and weights, and we'll need to earn money to subsidize the build out.

But open source doesn't need that. Gimp doesn't need millions of dollars in investment to subsidize infrastructure. Neither does Krita.

You do because you've created a "software factory" that requires the expense of burning tokens, which of course most open source projects can't afford.

It doesn't seem like you're building open source, it seems like you're building a moat.

>I'm working harder than I've ever worked in my life. You anti-AI people don't understand this because you don't try.

Brother everything you do - or rather everything your AI does and that you take credit for - is built on our work. The work that you mock, deride, and gleefully try to undermine while bragging about the money you make doing so.

At some point the hype is going to die and people are going to judge your products on their actual stability functionality. So far everyone who reviews them at the very least finds them fundamentally broken, and there is no professional adoption of any significance, at least not outside of the AI sphere.

The arrogance is astounding coming from someone whose photoshop clone can't even open a photoshop file.