Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists
by wmf on Sunday November 08, 2026 @08:44PM
(#50419929)
The only modification I'd make is to amortize the investments over 5-6 years instead of 20 because most of the cost is GPUs not the buildings. This increases the required revenue by 4x.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists
by t-writescode on Sunday November 08, 2026 @08:56PM
(#50420029)
Well, if you buy a bunch of GPUs and don't have buildings to put them in (a very real situation right now), then you're just .... holding hardware and not making a return off it and *the building (and related power infrastructure)* becomes much more important than how many GPUs you have.
There's one weird trick to preventing your GPUs from losing value. Buy all the ram.
Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists
by Joel_Mckay on Monday November 09, 2026 @12:30AM
(#50421428)
It is called market collusion, and Jensen Wong confessed on air to "advising" SK Hynix CEO to align with his corporate projects a year before the "AI" supply chain take over.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collusion
Technically against the law, even if folks reject the fact AMD & Nvidia are Monopolistic competitive firms in the GPU markets. Thankfully the LLM crowd are rapidly moving away from the CUDA ecosystem. =3
The trouble that that idea is that there comes a point where the generated AI needs machines to test the code that is generated... and it actually puts a limit on the growth of AI.
Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists
by drpixie on Sunday November 08, 2026 @11:47PM
(#50421174)
Another weird trick (that seems to be in play) - don't unpack them yet, so they are not yet depreciating assets! Listen to https://open.spotify.com/episode/1QjM5Ud5kjHzMIY5G7hjhW?si=o...