So it definitely should be changed. The Nvidia one is factual, while the other one is tabloid speculation.

He admitted to having a relationship with a woman.

There's a separate question of whether the woman was a spy.

Except they admitted it, in a separate press release: https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/statement-from-nvidia-boa...

They fragmented the information across two separate articles to lessen how bad it sounds

> There's a separate question of whether the woman was a spy.

I mean, it's pretty clear it was a spy. Have a look at WSJ, NYT, etc. It isn't tabloidish to say so.

People reading the nvida article will be wondering what is suspected. Probably why this article is trending as well as the original.

Whether tabloid, or completely inaccurate, Nvida make reference to it and that there is an independent investigation. It is not wrong for people to wonder what that is given they mention it.