Sometimes it's use is appropriate, but not in this case. Microsoft announced this change loudly, multiple times, starting more than a year ago. I seem to recall one of those announcements being discussed here on HN. Even the article links to it's own previous announcements, so "quietly" here is stupid rage bait to justify a blogspam advert.
No. The word 'quietly' attaches to the word 'rejecting' in the title in which it was used. Microsoft were not quietly rejecting messages; they were doing so conspicuously and in conformance with international standards for reporting such.
By all means, they introduced this change without prior warning, and it appears that it was a screw-up rather than a deliberate change:
https://www.theregister.com/applications/2026/11/09/outlookc...
But that is not the same thing as doing so quietly.