I'm quite confused by what you mean human level AI here. Maybe we haven't hit Einstein but we blew past the average person a long time ago.
Re:The End of AI Frontiers
by haltingproblem on Saturday November 07, 2026 @08:50PM
(#50409805)
It is very jagged and some people don't consider that human level AGI - it can solve Maths at the genius level just like Deep Blue could play chess at the grandmaster level. At this point it is simply an opinion and I can see the other side too.
[delayed]
Sorry, but what? We haven't done anything beyond strapping a large language model to a "harness".
At no point do I ever confuse a human being with a Claude session.
Even if I'm somehow fooled or confused for a minute, the context window / hallucinations / Claudeish will immediately give it away.
Sure, we passed the turing test for chatbots but we are very far away from AGI.
> but we blew past the average person a long time ago.
We did?
> This is also taking his comments about transformers scaling out of context
> AGI will require architecture changes not simply more data.
[0] He speaks about Bitter Lesson directly at 9:57 but the earlier part gives better context: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21EYKqUsPfg
AGI will require architecture changes not simply more data.