Re:Chomsky and the Two Cultures of Statistical Learning
by goatlover on Friday November 06, 2026 @05:02PM
(#50399095)
It's also not the first time a breakthrough technology was compared to the human brain/mind, but we also know biologically animal nervous systems are not digital computers, telephone/telegraph networks or hydraulic systems.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Chomsky and the Two Cultures of Statistical Learning
by codeulike on Friday November 06, 2026 @06:57PM
(#50400177)
I'm not saying LLMs work in the same way as us. But a few years ago humans used to be the only competent users of language on the planet. Now its humans + LLMs who are competent users of langauge. This is a big change, and I'm saying that it might be pointing to something deeper about complexity and how approaches to deal with complexity arise in the universe.
Re:Chomsky and the Two Cultures of Statistical Learning
by trgn on Saturday November 07, 2026 @09:05AM
(#50404641)
sure, but its facile to dismiss these breakthroughs as naive metaphors. physicans do understand now many bodily systems can be modeled with the same tools an engineer will model his machines. its not because these abstractions are incomplete, they are wrong.