Re:Anthropic IPO Buyers See Valuation as Low as $1.1T
by qlte on Friday November 06, 2026 @02:53PM
(#50397484)
Or incentivize using the minimum viable model for the job instead of throwing multi trillion parameter Fable sized models at summarizing documents or classification tasks.
I now do like 90% of my routine software dev/sysadmin stuff with Luna on Medium by default, some proportion of which could itself be offloaded to a small Qwen model.
Re:Anthropic IPO Buyers See Valuation as Low as $1.1T
by weakfish on Friday November 06, 2026 @03:14PM
(#50397799)
But I wonder if that offloading will happen if prices rise past a certain point and it becomes not worth it.
Re:Anthropic IPO Buyers See Valuation as Low as $1.1T
by gamblor956 on Friday November 06, 2026 @03:37PM
(#50398143)
Economic theory would state that if token prices go up people will stop offloading work onto LLMs and start doing it themselves again.
Indeed, 2026 was basically that: the LLM providers increased token costs and companies cut LLM spend to the bone. That is why Anthropic's IPO is struggling and MS and Google have failed to meet AI-related revenue targets for 3 straight years.
However this effect could just serve to make those who own the compute ridiculous money, while crushing those who need to lease compute.