News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash by jonkrone on Friday November 06, 2026 @08:53AM (#50392308)
Wait, I thought we were on Gemini 4?
Re:Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash by seunosewa on Friday November 06, 2026 @08:55AM (#50392324)
Omni is a video model.
Re:Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash by LtdJorge on Friday November 06, 2026 @08:58AM (#50392358)
Which, from a naming standpoint, doesn't make any sense
Re:Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash by brookst on Friday November 06, 2026 @08:56AM (#50392337)
It’s still bad versioning and will confuse people.
Re:Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash by rdtsc on Friday November 06, 2026 @09:14AM (#50392522)
But it still starts with “Gemini”. It would be better if they called it Gemini Omni 4, 4.1 etc. Otherwise call it just Omni 1.2 and drop the Gemini prefix.
Re:Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash by LoganDark on Friday November 06, 2026 @09:42AM (#50392903)
But it's not version 4 of Gemini Omni. It's version 1.2 of Gemini Omni. 4 is for normal Gemini.
Re:Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash by pyjarrett on Friday November 06, 2026 @09:37AM (#50392822)
It would be incredibly helpful to me if AI model names followed cars.

I'm not scratching my head about a "2025 Corolla." Windows 95 and 2000 had this built in, but then they lost it.

I'd prefer it was called Omni 2026.2 instead. It embeds a date and model and would package it as a product for on-premise or local hosting. It'd be easier to sell to the bean counters in the future: "We're running Omni 2026.2, we want to upgrade to Omni 2028."

Re:Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash by forgotpwd16 on Friday November 06, 2026 @11:03AM (#50394100)
[delayed]
Re:Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash by JacobAsmuth on Friday November 06, 2026 @02:12PM (#50396926)
They used to do that and everyone hated it lol. Hackernews complained endlessly about model names that were just a size and a date.