Re:France needs to read my paper
by giantg2 on Friday October 23, 2026 @06:54AM
(#50207013)
Holding raw land doesn't become a rent-seeking activity until it is sold. The owner could be waiting to accuse capital for development, waiting to purchase an ajoining property to expand, etc. A transfer tax fits this better than a land value tax.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There'll definitely be people in that camp, with good reasons for holding on to land. Flipside, there are many other people that know the land value mechanic and take advantage.
A transfer tax is decent, but it can be sidestepped by just holding land and selling when the tax changes. Land holding is a long game.
Re:France needs to read my paper
by forgotusername6 on Friday October 23, 2026 @07:00AM
(#50207062)
On the other hand you could argue that someone who had a better strategy for accruing capital should instead have purchased that land. The opportunity cost of nothing happing on that land is there regardless of the users intended future development.