News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by mrheosuper on Monday October 19, 2026 @04:38AM (#50149885)
> I realised the equivalent cost will serve me for years of ≈ $30 per month API/sub access

The advantage is no more 5-hours or weekly session limit anymore. Also no chance your proprietary code ends up in someone repo.

Re:DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by amunozo on Monday October 19, 2026 @06:35AM (#50150684)
I still think only privacy is relevant to run on your own infra, never cost.
Re:DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by vizzah on Monday October 19, 2026 @08:32AM (#50151611)
near.ai tries to solve this
Re:DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by crossroadsguy on Monday October 19, 2026 @06:27AM (#50150632)
That is literally my next sentence :D
Re:DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by david-gpu on Monday October 19, 2026 @06:42AM (#50150735)
> The advantage is no more 5-hours or weekly session limit anymore

That is not a concern with pay-as-you-go models like DeepSeek. It is stupid inexpensive.

Re:DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by Aurornis on Monday October 19, 2026 @09:28AM (#50152222)
API access does not have a 5-hour or weekly limit.

I run local models, too, but every discussion about these models uses the local quantized versions and the hosted versions interchangeably. They’re not interchangeable. The quantized versions you can run on mid-grade consumer hardware are a step down in quality. That might be fine or might not depending on your use case but it needs to be acknowledged. It’s not until you get into really expensive hardware setups that you can run something like DSv4 Flash at Q8, and you’re not breaking even on that relative to a cloud provider.

Keeping everything local is about the only reason to run local. The other discussions about saving money are missing something.