News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by crossroadsguy on Monday October 19, 2026 @04:26AM (#50149785)
I find these local infra costs crazy heavy duty. I always assume these folks are getting their values worth or that infra is serving multiple people's requests at and justifying the cost. Like I once thought of buying a 48-64 GB RAM laptop (not even clsoe to what these models need) and I realised the equivalent cost will serve me for years of ≈ $30 per month API/sub access. So I assume the usage is also heavy duty, or if nothing then for privacy and safety and then I guess the price, if one can pay, will totally be worth it.
Re:DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by origini on Monday October 19, 2026 @07:03AM (#50150877)
You just need to imagine someone making big bucks in tech + being a little bit money ignorant, having a big house and a nice basement and cheap energy prices.

Than it just makes sense that they already do this.

But to be fair, if i move, enough space for battery, solar and a basement which can take proper ML hardware + heat exchanger, is in my future vision.

Re:DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by johnbellone on Monday October 19, 2026 @08:42AM (#50151714)
Unless you have solar and batteries there aren't cheap energy prices :).
Re:DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by origini on Monday October 19, 2026 @09:31AM (#50152259)
I'm german, i pay $45 US Cents / 40 cents in Euro.

Sooooo :D

Re:DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by mrheosuper on Monday October 19, 2026 @04:38AM (#50149885)
> I realised the equivalent cost will serve me for years of ≈ $30 per month API/sub access

The advantage is no more 5-hours or weekly session limit anymore. Also no chance your proprietary code ends up in someone repo.

Re:DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by amunozo on Monday October 19, 2026 @06:35AM (#50150684)
I still think only privacy is relevant to run on your own infra, never cost.
Re:DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by vizzah on Monday October 19, 2026 @08:32AM (#50151611)
near.ai tries to solve this
Re:DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by crossroadsguy on Monday October 19, 2026 @06:27AM (#50150632)
That is literally my next sentence :D
Re:DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by david-gpu on Monday October 19, 2026 @06:42AM (#50150735)
> The advantage is no more 5-hours or weekly session limit anymore

That is not a concern with pay-as-you-go models like DeepSeek. It is stupid inexpensive.

Re:DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by Aurornis on Monday October 19, 2026 @09:28AM (#50152222)
API access does not have a 5-hour or weekly limit.

I run local models, too, but every discussion about these models uses the local quantized versions and the hosted versions interchangeably. They’re not interchangeable. The quantized versions you can run on mid-grade consumer hardware are a step down in quality. That might be fine or might not depending on your use case but it needs to be acknowledged. It’s not until you get into really expensive hardware setups that you can run something like DSv4 Flash at Q8, and you’re not breaking even on that relative to a cloud provider.

Keeping everything local is about the only reason to run local. The other discussions about saving money are missing something.

Re:DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by lnenad on Monday October 19, 2026 @07:22AM (#50151014)
If the only variable is money, local models will never make any sense at these prices of infra/subscriptions.

For a lot of people, there are other variables though.

Re:DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by JKCalhoun on Monday October 19, 2026 @09:29AM (#50152230)
Looking ahead, do we think token costs will remain where they are today? Go down? Up?

Your investment in hardware is of course fixed, the token cost amortized over time.

I suppose the other question is, do we think down the road that the models capable of being run locally will improve?

Re:DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by scld on Monday October 19, 2026 @09:44AM (#50152421)
Everything's been trending down so far, so until evidence shows otherwise, I'd assume it will continue that trend. IMO the best time to buy local infra will be when that trend begins to asymptote.
Re:DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by dgellow on Monday October 19, 2026 @10:21AM (#50152858)
There is so much down pressure, I cannot imagine the token/s price going up. It has been going down and will continue doing so, we are far from a plateau IMHO
Re:DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by lhl on Tuesday October 20, 2026 @01:51PM (#50170064)
Cost/task is probably a better metric to track than raw tokens. Here's Epoch AI's recent report that IMO tracks with my experience (5-10X improvement YoY): https://epoch.ai/publications/the-plunging-price-of-thought

There are many overlapping/compounding curves all happening simultaneously pushing cost down, even on the same hardware - faster software, which includes improvements that massively improve memory/memory bandwidth efficiency for model (especially improved kvcache, specdec/MTP, expert loading becoming standard), improved architectures (no one using full attention, engrams), and a never-ending stream of training improvements.

I think one only has to look at Qwen 3.8 27B to see how top tier a smaller model (<15GB Q4) can be. IMO it's one of the first small models to be able to be run as an agentic coder (it's not quite Opus 4.6-level, but it's not that far off), and with MTP/DFlash2, it's runs surprisingly fast on consumer GPUs. The 30B-class MoEs run even faster, and with the right tuning/post-training I'm sure they can match frontier capabilities in many areas (including coding) over the next months. I think last year the open/local AI picture was a lot more grim than it feels like now, tbt.