Re:I never authorized an integration that scans my secrets
by bspammer on Friday October 16, 2026 @07:48PM
(#50126316)
Just to add to your point, I’ve deliberately avoided home-assistant since this kerfuffle where frenck was quite rude to the NixOS maintainers. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27505277
Re:I never authorized an integration that scans my secrets
by subscribed on Friday October 16, 2026 @10:40PM
(#50127367)
Ouch, what a painful read.
I avoided HA due to some technical issues published and the further development, but that quote absolutely cemented the decision in me:
> It made me decide to request for complete removal. > I suggest you honor that request and sit on your wounds.
What a.... colourful persona! I wonder if he was alluding to the potential and baseless C&D request or his opinion that one person's wish revokes MIT licence just because.
But..... That's quite painful to read.
Re:I never authorized an integration that scans my secrets
by OrderlyTiamat on Saturday October 17, 2026 @02:20PM
(#50133615)
That's a very bad look. Both of these incidents make me happy I haven't implemented Home Assistant yet, I'll look for something else.
Re:I never authorized an integration that scans my secrets
by spl757 on Friday October 16, 2026 @09:12PM
(#50126844)
I've been considering home assistant, and yeah this gives me pause.
IMHO it's just not the kind of behavior that is expected by the people that use the software.
The fact that it didn't occur to anyone that this isn't a good idea makes me question other design decisions. When local-only isn't local-only, that's a problem.
Just my $0.02.