News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:IRCv3 by prologic on Sunday October 11, 2026 @08:59AM (#50042887)
You are right. To be perfectly honest, the only thing I took from Discord at all (it's UI is generally awful yes, I agree!) is the support for multiple servers. But now that I think about it some more, that's not really even a unique feature.

Anyway, you are right. But that's more about Ahoy and less about Parley. Parley was just answering the question of "What if IRC was federated, and what if it borrowed some ideas from Salty.im -- DNS discovery + WKID".

Re:IRCv3 by itintheory on Sunday October 11, 2026 @09:53AM (#50043325)
Wasn't IRC always federated? There were different networks, but each network was a federation of independent servers.owmed by independent operators as far as I understand...
Re:IRCv3 by prologic on Sunday October 11, 2026 @10:06AM (#50043450)
I don't believe so, not in the strictness sense.

> A federated network is a system where independent networks, servers, or organizations agree to follow common standards so they can talk to each other without giving up control to a single central company.

In traditional IRC networks, you end up forming a spanning tree of servers that belong to a common name, "the network". However control remains in the hands of the operators of that network.

Re:IRCv3 by AtHeartEngineer on Sunday October 11, 2026 @10:26AM (#50043668)
but you could change networks, you could run your own.
Re:IRCv3 by jjrh on Sunday October 11, 2026 @12:08PM (#50044758)
Protocol was documented but each server is a silo.
Re:IRCv3 by wredcoll on Sunday October 11, 2026 @01:26PM (#50045578)
The "control" was basically permission to connect (and thus share messages/users/etc) between multiple servers. So I see your point, you couldn't just randomly connect your server to someone else's server in quite the same way email worked, but at the same time the servers could be easily owned by different people running different software.
Re:IRCv3 by RunSet on Sunday October 11, 2026 @04:10PM (#50047324)
> the only thing I took from Discord at all (it's UI is generally awful yes, I agree!) is the support for multiple servers.

To be sure, Discord "servers" are not servers in the sense the word is used in virtually every other context. They are more like group chats that share a hosting location. If anything the hard part for Discord is making them seem disparate enough that someone might rent their "own server".

Re:IRCv3 by em-bee on Sunday October 11, 2026 @09:30PM (#50050204)
any irc client i have used so far has had support for multiple servers. so what's new here?

irc federation is entirely different. with federation client support for multiple servers is not actually needed. those features are orthogonal.