News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Orkut.com by achatham on Thursday October 08, 2026 @12:21PM (#50007779)
It was built in-house at Google, not aquired. Orkut (the person) had been working at Google for several years before he built orkut.com. He'd done a similar site at Stanford pre-Google (and pre-Friendster!)
Re:Orkut.com by Zigurd on Thursday October 08, 2026 @01:19PM (#50008743)
IIRC it was a 20% time project. Up to you to decide if that makes 20% time more or less of a good idea.
Re:Orkut.com by TimVasil on Thursday October 08, 2026 @03:49PM (#50011105)
I was the Associate Product Manager assigned to Orkut as it prepared to launch. It was not 20% of his time ;-) Orkut was the backup name we had to go with because we couldn't reach a deal to get the name he wanted (eden.com) from a domain squatter.
Re:Orkut.com by DonHopkins on Thursday October 08, 2026 @06:34PM (#50013380)
They paved Paradise and put up a parking lot.
Re:Orkut.com by wyclif on Thursday October 08, 2026 @10:32PM (#50015265)
Looks like somebody got it. Do you remember what the squatter's terms were then, or was it simply not for sale at any price?
Re:Orkut.com by udit99 on Friday October 09, 2026 @08:27AM (#50019513)
Good to know! But did it originate as a 20% time project? Because this is not the first time I've heard this.
Re:Orkut.com by rafaelcosta on Thursday October 08, 2026 @02:34PM (#50009996)
Today I learned! The aspx and the lack of branding really had me fooled. And when the Google branding came along, that’s when it started to go down in my circle, so I never knew that it was a Google (20%) project!