News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sharing AI progress in mathematics by foota on Tuesday October 06, 2026 @07:14PM (#49985516)
From their github: "The average result used the equivalent compute of roughly three hours of ChatGPT Pro thinking." That's pretty crazy.
Re:Sharing AI progress in mathematics by dyauspitr on Tuesday October 06, 2026 @11:08PM (#49987601)
Crazy because that’s almost nothing right?
Re:Sharing AI progress in mathematics by foota on Tuesday October 06, 2026 @11:19PM (#49987691)
Yes
Re:Sharing AI progress in mathematics by johnisom2001 on Wednesday October 07, 2026 @12:17PM (#49994916)
This is what really made me think to my self, "holy shit". I can't believe not more people are noticing and talking about this. Unless perhaps they didn't actually read the README, and are just talking about what they heard from someone who also didn't read it?
Re:Sharing AI progress in mathematics by oblio on Thursday October 08, 2026 @07:38AM (#50004613)
People don't believe this because it's false, those 3 hours are just the last session connecting all the dots. They've tried a lot more, probably thousands of hours, in total.
Re:Sharing AI progress in mathematics by foota on Thursday October 08, 2026 @01:52PM (#50009301)
Honestly? I don't think so. If anything I think they would obscure this using averages (e.g., maybe they solved some hundred problems and the easy ones took a few minutes and the hard ones took a couple of days), but if they have a model that's as good at math as they are as coding I don't see why it'd be impossible.

I think novel mathematics is intrinsically harder than coding (much in the way that computer science research is harder than coding), but the models are scary good at coding.