News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Dots: Always-on agents by panarky on Tuesday September 29, 2026 @04:53PM (#49900352)
Imagine 2001: A Space Odyssey with Meta's "Jolly" avatar as HAL instead of a blinking red camera lens.

So much more terrifying for a cute, round, fuzzy, friendly, rosy-cheeked plushie trying to exterminate the crew.

Re:Dots: Always-on agents by jacquesm on Tuesday September 29, 2026 @08:13PM (#49902664)
That has a real horror movie vibe in the exact way that 2001 didn't.
Re:Dots: Always-on agents by esseph on Wednesday September 30, 2026 @03:46AM (#49905737)
Did Claude write this?
Re:Dots: Always-on agents by jacquesm on Wednesday September 30, 2026 @05:09AM (#49906290)
Wtf kind of comment is that? Should I respond with 'you must be new here?'
Re:Dots: Always-on agents by esseph on Wednesday September 30, 2026 @07:26AM (#49907357)
1. There are accounts on here that have LLMs responding for them.

2. The sentence is the exact type of structure a LLM writes :/ It's unfortunate.

Re:Dots: Always-on agents by panarky on Wednesday September 30, 2026 @03:41PM (#49913327)
The second most boring type of HN comment is the accusation of LLM ghostwriting.

And the most boring comment is the one noting how boring it is to keep making these accusations.

Re:Dots: Always-on agents by derefr on Thursday October 01, 2026 @03:22AM (#49918742)
Presuming you are new-enough here that you didn't realize that jacquesm has been posting on HN for a very, very long time: did you consider clicking on the GP's profile link to answer your own question?
Re:Dots: Always-on agents by esseph on Thursday October 01, 2026 @12:45PM (#49924024)
I have seen accounts on here registered 10+ yr that now have LLMs responding for them. And a lot of users on here with accounts that are months to years old? Often not their first account, they may use several to respond with or to try and break up their digital footprint.
Re:Dots: Always-on agents by mattoxic on Tuesday September 29, 2026 @11:54PM (#49904184)
Darkstar did have a vicious but cute beach ball
Re:Dots: Always-on agents by zh3 on Wednesday September 30, 2026 @03:59AM (#49905836)
"How was I supposed to know it was full of air?" :)
Re:Dots: Always-on agents by sublinear on Wednesday September 30, 2026 @01:04AM (#49904556)
Is it?

Every time I think of any attempt to make something "cute" into something "dangerous", I can't take any of it seriously.

I'm reminded of mid-2000s clichés promoted by the edgelords of the time, and that was the peak edgelord era of all time.