Re:ReBarUEFI: Resizable BAR for almost any UEFI system
by mathisfun123 on Tuesday September 22, 2026 @10:35PM
(#49810955)
> What is the purpose of your comments?
Same as his: to voice my frustration about something on the internet.
Re:ReBarUEFI: Resizable BAR for almost any UEFI system
by Dylan16807 on Wednesday September 23, 2026 @12:53AM
(#49811789)
Your original comment sure didn't do that. It just gave an incorrect answer.
Re:ReBarUEFI: Resizable BAR for almost any UEFI system
by mathisfun123 on Wednesday September 23, 2026 @01:06AM
(#49811873)
What exactly was "incorrect" about it? He asked for a purpose and a use-case not an explanation.
Re:ReBarUEFI: Resizable BAR for almost any UEFI system
by Dylan16807 on Wednesday September 23, 2026 @03:55AM
(#49812953)
> not an explanation
Wrong.
Re:ReBarUEFI: Resizable BAR for almost any UEFI system
by mathisfun123 on Wednesday September 23, 2026 @11:06AM
(#49817296)
.... It's literally right there:
> I'm still clueless on what the purpose and use-case is for ReBAR
Are you seriously debating this?
Re:ReBarUEFI: Resizable BAR for almost any UEFI system
by Dylan16807 on Wednesday September 23, 2026 @02:43PM
(#49820599)
They wanted a basic explanation in response to that.
Or to put it differently, I would take the sentence "He asked for a purpose and a use-case not an explanation." and replace the word "not" with a comma.
Re:ReBarUEFI: Resizable BAR for almost any UEFI system
by mathisfun123 on Wednesday September 23, 2026 @02:52PM
(#49820724)
I quoted the direct response. I have no idea what you're debating.
Re:ReBarUEFI: Resizable BAR for almost any UEFI system
by Dylan16807 on Wednesday September 23, 2026 @04:40PM
(#49822245)
I'm not sure how to put it simpler.
I agree with "He asked for a purpose and a use-case". (This is what your quote supports.)
I disagree with "not an explanation".
When asking for a purpose and use case, they were asking for an explanation.
Also, ReBAR can get complicated as you can see from other responses above. The articles on the web are also not really good as they tend to replicate marketing material and make vague statements about performance, but fail to explain how specifically performance is improved.