News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:macOS 27 Golden Gate: The Ars Technica Review by Telaneo on Wednesday September 16, 2026 @06:01PM (#49733648)
Christ.

On some level, this is probably something your terminal emulator should handle, just as your web browser should handle a mess of 22 tabs, but I don't think we've really come up with good solutions there either. It's hard to implement features nobody's though of.

Re:macOS 27 Golden Gate: The Ars Technica Review by mijowi on Wednesday September 16, 2026 @06:56PM (#49734163)
Terminal emulators have tabs and windows already, even macOS’ built in terminal, so what do you mean?
Re:macOS 27 Golden Gate: The Ars Technica Review by Telaneo on Wednesday September 16, 2026 @08:55PM (#49735126)
That solutions like tabs should be the responsibility of the terminal emulator you're using, and not the greater OS.
Re:macOS 27 Golden Gate: The Ars Technica Review by fragmede on Wednesday September 16, 2026 @09:40PM (#49735420)
Should it? In terms of window management, what's ideal? Should every program have to implement tabs and then have its own tab manager, and bookmarks and favorites? If we take a step back and look at the bigger window management problem, what makes the most sense for most users? Monitors these days are relatively cheap, so the fight for screen real estate isn't the same problem as it once was. The onus is on the operating system to make it better for the user to arrange things how they want things to work.
Re:macOS 27 Golden Gate: The Ars Technica Review by dr_dshiv on Wednesday September 16, 2026 @06:07PM (#49733704)
Terminal should be responsibility of OS. God knows it’s deep enough. It could be so much better—and it matters!

I know expecting UX innovation from Apple is laughable, but there was a time…