News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I spent $220 on Google app ads. 60% of the installs were ... by mitxela on Friday September 11, 2026 @07:25PM (#49666803)
No that makes no sense. They only need a tiny device to act as a proxy. It makes no sense to colocate the expensive GPUs
Re:I spent $220 on Google app ads. 60% of the installs were ... by roosterIllusi0n on Friday September 11, 2026 @08:12PM (#49667163)
It makes sense when someone else is paying for the power. The AI capabilities of mobile cpus is for pushing cloud based AI to your device. You pay the power bill while retaining the same lack of privacy as cloud hosted AI.
Re:I spent $220 on Google app ads. 60% of the installs were ... by fluoridation on Friday September 11, 2026 @08:19PM (#49667219)
I'm pretty sure the company that owns the compute is the one paying for the power. Who would agree to have an ugly noisy cube in their property that they have to pay maintenance for? What would they get out of that deal?
Re:I spent $220 on Google app ads. 60% of the installs were ... by stingraycharles on Friday September 11, 2026 @10:40PM (#49668188)
Yeah, the usual approach here is to offer a free VPN service, and then piggyback traffic over the user’s internet provider. Much, much more scalable and cheaper than offering to put GPUs at a user’s home.
Re:I spent $220 on Google app ads. 60% of the installs were ... by bornfreddy on Saturday September 12, 2026 @01:24AM (#49669128)
Wow, that's genius. Basically, user gets a VPN but so does provider, in a sense.
Re:I spent $220 on Google app ads. 60% of the installs were ... by mitxela on Saturday September 12, 2026 @02:44AM (#49669560)
You can offer them a free anything, really. It's a pretty convenient way to pay, that mostly doesn't affect the user at all (unless their connection is very slow), but generates value.
Re:I spent $220 on Google app ads. 60% of the installs were ... by tstenner on Saturday September 12, 2026 @03:28AM (#49669871)
"value"
Re:I spent $220 on Google app ads. 60% of the installs were ... by mitxela on Saturday September 12, 2026 @04:35AM (#49670302)
Yes, it does. Just because the value is for someone else and not you, that doesn't make it any less real.