News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I spent $220 on Google app ads. 60% of the installs were ... by rao-v on Friday September 11, 2026 @05:50PM (#49665886)
Isn't this the sort of thing Google is supposed to be doing for us?
Re:I spent $220 on Google app ads. 60% of the installs were ... by autoexec on Friday September 11, 2026 @06:50PM (#49666508)
What incentive do they have to do that kind of work? They get paid anyway and they've basically got no competition
Re:I spent $220 on Google app ads. 60% of the installs were ... by Culonavirus on Saturday September 12, 2026 @02:26AM (#49669479)
"They get paid anyway" yeah not really. Businesses have margins and marketing budgets. There's only so much you can spend on ads and if those ads don't convert, you go elsewhere, you literally have to. You spends less on Google ads and more or Meta or other channels (influencers, marketplaces, etc. etc.)

Google has to be careful, ads that convert less are less valuable (duh) and what happens is not "well the business will just buy more ads", but "well the business has a 35% gross margin and marketing expenses already account for 20% of gross profit, they can't just buy more ads"

Re:I spent $220 on Google app ads. 60% of the installs were ... by ricardonunez on Friday September 11, 2026 @06:49PM (#49666497)
I agree but that will eliminate a big cash cow for them.
Re:I spent $220 on Google app ads. 60% of the installs were ... by MBCook on Saturday September 12, 2026 @12:26AM (#49668822)
Why would you expect the water company to check your water for poison?
Re:I spent $220 on Google app ads. 60% of the installs were ... by necovek on Saturday September 12, 2026 @01:54AM (#49669304)
Liability when it happens?

Don't all water companies do it?

And while it may point at what we could do with Google and the likes, the risk profile is still a bit different (make many people ill or die vs "unknowingly" stealing some money).

Re:I spent $220 on Google app ads. 60% of the installs were ... by MBCook on Saturday September 12, 2026 @10:46AM (#49672860)
My comment was meant to be sarcasm. I see that didn’t come through.
Re:I spent $220 on Google app ads. 60% of the installs were ... by necovek on Saturday September 12, 2026 @04:27PM (#49676842)
It did partially, which is why I have the second part — even if we applied the same rule, it's not really apples-to-apples.
Re:I spent $220 on Google app ads. 60% of the installs were ... by MBCook on Saturday September 12, 2026 @10:54PM (#49679505)
It isn’t. But it should be.

I find online advertising crooked as hell. Google charges by the impression and knowingly allows huge percentages of fake impressions. How is that anything other than fraud?

It’s not because it’s online advertising. And that sucks.

Re:I spent $220 on Google app ads. 60% of the installs were ... by necovek on Sunday September 13, 2026 @01:52PM (#49686635)
I am not disagreeing it's outright fraud. I am disagreeing it's the same thing as water company not testing the water they distribute on purpose (or hiding the negative results).