Re:Procedural Graphs: Self-Evolving Execution Structures for...
by conception on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @05:12PM
(#49634416)
Don't post generated text or AI-edited text. HN is for conversation between humans.
Re:Procedural Graphs: Self-Evolving Execution Structures for...
by cyanydeez on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @05:14PM
(#49634443)
what if it's not generated text, but autism or god forbid, a german.
Re:Procedural Graphs: Self-Evolving Execution Structures for...
by EGreg on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @05:28PM
(#49634635)
Achtung!
Re:Procedural Graphs: Self-Evolving Execution Structures for...
by guybedo on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @04:47PM
(#49634026)
your load-bearing thesis is probably interesting but it seems i can't read AI written text anymore -- or maybe i just need some more coffee.
Re:Procedural Graphs: Self-Evolving Execution Structures for...
by EGreg on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @05:05PM
(#49634314)
im happy for you tho, or sorry that happened
Re:Procedural Graphs: Self-Evolving Execution Structures for...
by horacemorace on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @09:08PM
(#49636964)
I also believe that, but also can’t follow LLM copy.
I'm going to drop a bomb over here: what if agents are the root of all our problems in AI safety, cost, and even adoption by regulated organizations? I really do believe this. Here is what I argue:
https://safebots.ai/agents.html
https://safebots.ai/kimi.html
And here is my overall thesis:
https://safebots.ai/thesis.html
If you do manage to read (or skim) that, I welcome any questions, comments or rebuttals.