horacemorace

We do. Oil for your old fashioned car and farmers for votes.

Along these lines I’m curious how a scratch trained model with a few built-in tools (memory, calculator, ?) available during a single generation would behave. Not tool calls as turns.

None of these help me understand what the sound is like because they’re all time-domain which runs way too fast for humans to intuit. Visualizations in the frequency domain are a lot more natural.

It just so happens that helping open source is the result. Image how far behind we’d (the hackers, not the moneymen) be as a sharing community be without them.

I also believe that, but also can’t follow LLM copy.

“Strong enough to be gentle” is the epitome of manhood.

Say that again when your children are starving.

Humans simply choose whatever is comfortable and conforming. If their tribal mantra is solar panels, they’ll do that just like they’ll do anything else.

They’ll certainly try to stymie people by colluding with manufacturers until we get nvidia level hardware or LLM ASICs from the East.

The mechanism would have to be peer-to-peer somehow. Blacklist hosters are always destroyed by lawfare and bots.

Which coincidentally helps average people far more than the already rich investors in a few western mega corps. If it weren’t for these big Chinese model releases the western companies wouldn’t release anything at all. The field would be advancing at a snail’s pace.

I’ve switched to D2 from mermaid after they removed ELK from the base. Dagre just doesn’t work for me. I wish there were better options.

“Assumption of regularity” isn’t. Under this plutocratic corrupt regime

Excepting the turbo fascism, that is. People must be able feel agency while parenting or they can’t parent well.

Fingers crossed this inspires a Chinese lab to release some weights so people can benefit.

Perhaps to moneymen the difference between “ChatGPT” and the technology behind it isnt’t obvious. I’ve been very surprised at how few otherwise smart people are completely in the dark about how capable current models are.

As soon as manufacturing starts building this stuff more, it will commoditize. The hardware prices won’t be terribly larger than the original. We’ll have a “Bambu labs” style company to make the AI OS, whatever that is.

Garden snails around seattle will absolutely bite you (teeny tiny bite) and draw blood if you let them crawl around on your skin.

With a name like Galena it’s no wonder they found lead there! /ducks

Where is the model?

Once prices settle down it doesn’t seem unreasonable that everyone who wants modern conveniences plops down $3k for a home computer. It’s still cheaper than during the “home computer revolution” 80s/90s when normies were buying these at Sears and Radio Shack.

If this kind of thing holds true for humans we now may understand synesthesia, perhaps we find ourselves with a large enough study pool to map out clever tricks to influence each other.

I deployed many of those things successfully a decade ago. Worked great!

Said the rich swe, fully oblivious of many who struggle to feed their own children.

A million times this. There is “private” as a corporate-legality licensing perspective. There is “private” as a human concept. The two are seemingly opposite, yet as all the money is focused on the former there’s no airtime left for the latter.

Right. But at their core they are math formulas devised by a process designed to produce mimicry of task completion. The math formulas themselves aren’t fully effable. We’re sure studying the heck out of how they complete the tasks! Bet they converged on how we do it, since it’s our language, but who knows.

Lots of folks don’t consider it a problem because it relies on ridiculous assumptions.

This doesn’t make sense at all.

This future is here already, policy makers have it locked up. Any person who remembers what microfiche is understands the magnitude of this problem of not having a trustworthy public record. If we extended public policy from the library era, the library of congress itself would be the Internet Archive.

Sounds also like Daniel Dennett.

From an internal perspective, thoughts are both the witness and the witnessed. The problem only comes when trying to apply our language which is firmly rooted in this artificial dualism.