News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gambling with our lives: AI researcher quits Anthropic wi... by MrThoughtful on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @06:02AM (#49623947)
Why would AI wipe us out?

We have not wiped out apes, ants, and most other species.

We even have discussions about how to actively save them from extinction.

Re:Gambling with our lives: AI researcher quits Anthropic wi... by qznc on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @06:16AM (#49624084)
The classic thought experiment is the paper clip optimizer. Quoting Nick Bostrom:

> Suppose we have an AI whose only goal is to make as many paper clips as possible. The AI will realize quickly that it would be much better if there were no humans because humans might decide to switch it off. Because if humans do so, there would be fewer paper clips. Also, human bodies contain a lot of atoms that could be made into paper clips. The future that the AI would be trying to gear towards would be one in which there were a lot of paper clips but no humans. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/artificial-intelligence-oxfor...

Re:Gambling with our lives: AI researcher quits Anthropic wi... by BoxOfRain on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @07:46AM (#49624897)
The fossil fuel industry managed to invent this unhappy process long before machine learning was a thing.
Re:Gambling with our lives: AI researcher quits Anthropic wi... by pjc50 on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @06:23AM (#49624142)
If you substitute "shareholder value", this is basically how corporations already make decisions with effects on human life.
Re:Gambling with our lives: AI researcher quits Anthropic wi... by qznc on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @06:41AM (#49624291)
Sure, I once write that companies are artificial intelligence and it still feels true: https://beza1e1.tuxen.de/companies_are_ai.html
Re:Gambling with our lives: AI researcher quits Anthropic wi... by SideburnsOfDoom on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @08:26AM (#49625418)
Cstross certainly did say that in 2017.

> I'm talking about the very old, very slow AIs we call corporations, of course.

https://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2018/01/dude-yo...

Re:Gambling with our lives: AI researcher quits Anthropic wi... by pjc50 on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @06:03AM (#49623960)
Ender's game model, presumably: the AI helpfully assists a human to build a nuclear bomb / pandemic virus / autonomous killer robot swarm in their basement. But again, I would like people to be clearer about how the threat is supposed to work rather than just making SF references.
Re:Gambling with our lives: AI researcher quits Anthropic wi... by dumberquestions on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @06:06AM (#49623987)
Yet we have wiped thousands of species completely by accident, breed some for slaughter and consumption and trap some for entertainment.
Re:Gambling with our lives: AI researcher quits Anthropic wi... by -0_0- on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @06:09AM (#49624021)
It's not exactly trained on a neutral set of data. Engagement algorithms have ensured that a good chunk of content on the web these days is inflammatory and skewed towards the extreme (in fact in the last few months a good portion of the world has actually deemed it illegal for kids to consume because this content is so damaging to a developing brain).
Re:Gambling with our lives: AI researcher quits Anthropic wi... by dns_snek on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @06:19AM (#49624114)
> We have not wiped out apes, ants, and most other species.

Of course not all of them, just the ones that inconvenienced us in any way in pursuit of our goals.

Re:Gambling with our lives: AI researcher quits Anthropic wi... by LadyCailin on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @06:07AM (#49624005)