Re:Trey Parker and Matt Stone Are Changing the Name of South...
by conorcleary on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @06:13AM
(#49624059)
What if the mansion had balloons and the jet was grounded? /s The point of shows like SP taking on targets like Gore were their eco-shaming angles; these people we know of and hear of are polished products of Corp. Inc. and if they have a green angle it's accompanied by green-washing, which will have anti and pro groupies alongside stirring up discourse that is both helpful and non
Re:Trey Parker and Matt Stone Are Changing the Name of South...
by Gud on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @06:24AM
(#49624152)
If Gore had built a floating castle in the sky, a one off magical house, I’d say, he’s alright
Re:Trey Parker and Matt Stone Are Changing the Name of South...
by psd1 on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @02:59PM
(#49632179)
Your observation of the contradiction is correct, but reductionist to a fault. If Gore would have been better than Dubya, and if campaigning requires travel, etc.
I take it you don't decry hydro for the use of concrete?
Re:Trey Parker and Matt Stone Are Changing the Name of South...
by tzs on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @08:27PM
(#49636570)
That's ridiculous. It is perfectly reasonable to live a normal life by the current standards of the world while advocating for political change that will change those standards to be better for the environment.
No champion of the environment gallivants in a jet and lives in a mansion.