To be fair, Spotify was a slop factory long before LLMs started doing it

They are in the business of selling audio slop streams, why are you surprised?

True

I could only read one sentence, then skipped to another paragraph. Sure enough the scroll bar revealed a suspiciously long article. No human would ever write this much bland bullshit.

Next sentence was also an AI juxtaposition. Done.

Yeah, stopped reading after the first paragraph. It's really so disrespectful to your audience.

It‘s someone from R&D probably not so official

Spotify? The company pushing AI “music” into people’s feeds to save money on royalties? That Spotify?

I noticed

> The modes are the load-bearing piece:

Why do people write like LLMs? Maybe they delegate all the work to a LLM and don't have the time or the will to edit the copy. How about telling another LLMs to replace at least the most common LLM patterns with something human looking?

I don't feel like this was a piece by someone who has used LLMs too much.

I'm fairly confident this is just LLM writing the majority, possibly tweaked by a human.

Opening line is a form of, "It's not X, it's Y": ".. isn't thinking. It's I/O".

Then the start of the second paragraph is that weird breathless kind of writing:

> Reading five files to answer a question about one method. Generating a test file that follows the exact same pattern as the twenty test files next to it.

More "It's not X, it's Y": The seat license isn't what hurts, it's the tokens.

The softly pressed insistence that AI is worth it, really: "The tooling pays for itself but only if..."

They should use their portal to de-claude the writing.