News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bun 1.4 by hungryhobbit on Thursday August 20, 2026 @12:41PM (#49376995)
It's way late and seriously over budget, hard to call that a success.
Re:Bun 1.4 by internet2000 on Thursday August 20, 2026 @12:55PM (#49377167)
It's an unconditional success no matter how you slice it.
Re:Bun 1.4 by reducesuffering on Thursday August 20, 2026 @12:49PM (#49377092)
~3 months start to finish and the price of 1 engineer for a year, to rewrite a critical infra codebase that tens of millions of user software relies on. Truly the goalposts keep moving. This kind of project would've have been 10x the effort and price a few years ago.
Re:Bun 1.4 by aenis on Thursday August 20, 2026 @12:59PM (#49377225)
Yeah, crucially, a lot of such projects never get greenlit.

Claude building stuff means a lot of things that everybody wanted to do, just couldn't allocate the attention or other resources - now get built.

Re:Bun 1.4 by moljac024 on Friday August 21, 2026 @07:35AM (#49386575)
It's likely much closer to that price if you don't calculate with subsidized token pricing.
Re:Bun 1.4 by reducesuffering on Friday August 21, 2026 @02:18PM (#49391970)
Once a model like Fable/Mythos is trained, that was used for this project, the inference costs are profitable. CapEx vs. OpEx. Every new Zig->Rust port of this caliber using Fable/Mythos costs the standard token price, it's not subsidized. The model already exists for the original CapEx, you can do 1,000 ports of this for standard token pricing.
Re:Bun 1.4 by cleaning on Thursday August 20, 2026 @01:13PM (#49377403)
What budget?
Re:Bun 1.4 by rwz on Thursday August 20, 2026 @12:48PM (#49377074)
What are you talking about? What is the budget? Was there ever a deadline? Who ever decided those?
Re:Bun 1.4 by Jcampuzano2 on Thursday August 20, 2026 @06:51PM (#49381353)
This couldn't be further from the truth. It was if anything severely under budget of you compare it to what it'd normally cost in engineering time.