Re:Bun 1.4 Rust rewrite is not looking good
by owebmaster on Thursday August 20, 2026 @07:30AM
(#49373182)
> But I still strongly believe the project makes a lot of sense, and I genuinely think these issues can be solved by 2028, if the project keeps its focus on stability instead of another SDK for SQL, web sockets, image compression, or whatever comes next
If you check the maintainer X, he's asking Claude for what features to implement next. Not only stabilizing isn't the priority, even the features implemented are random.
Re:Bun 1.4 Rust rewrite is not looking good
by andsoitis on Thursday August 20, 2026 @09:13AM
(#49374176)
> If you check the maintainer X, he's asking Claude for what features to implement next.
Link?
Re:Bun 1.4 Rust rewrite is not looking good
by andsoitis on Thursday August 20, 2026 @09:58AM
(#49374663)
Thanks. Seems pretty innocent to me.
Re:Bun 1.4 Rust rewrite is not looking good
by owebmaster on Thursday August 20, 2026 @12:23PM
(#49376782)
What does innocent even mean in this context? I don't care if it's innocent. It is. Naivy too. But millions of people use the system and were expecting stability, not it to be a random AI experiment.
Re:Bun 1.4 Rust rewrite is not looking good
by locknitpicker on Thursday August 20, 2026 @09:54AM
(#49374600)
> If you check the maintainer X, he's asking Claude for what features to implement next. Not only stabilizing isn't the priority, even the features implemented are random.
To me that sort of stunt sounds like blatant attempts to distract the audience away from relevant topics.
But I still strongly believe the project makes a lot of sense, and I genuinely think these issues can be solved by 2028, if the project keeps its focus on stability instead of another SDK for SQL, web sockets, image compression, or whatever comes next