News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Heart aerospace completes first flight of largest electri... by cj on Thursday August 13, 2026 @10:38AM (#49286666)
I've never quite understood negative electric/gas/oil prices.

Are you literally paid for agreeing to receive the energy?

Re:Heart aerospace completes first flight of largest electri... by eliben on Thursday August 13, 2026 @10:43AM (#49286745)
Yes. Counterintuitive, but it make sense when you take all the factors into account (such that completely shutting down and then later restarting turbines may cost a generator more than paying someone to take power off their hands).
Re:Heart aerospace completes first flight of largest electri... by cogman10 on Thursday August 13, 2026 @08:32PM (#49293445)
Yup. What people have to realize is that power generation has inertia and can be painful to start/stop. But also, the power output always has to match the power demand. If you don't, you get either brown outs or over voltages.

When you add sources like solar onto the grid, you end up with times of the day where high solar production pushes base load power generators to need to slow down or shutdown.

Re:Heart aerospace completes first flight of largest electri... by robin_reala on Thursday August 13, 2026 @10:47AM (#49286824)
Yep. Last August the total cost to charge my car for the month was -10SEK of about -$1.05 US, as my energy company was trying to put load into its batteries at the times when the grid most needed it.
Re:Heart aerospace completes first flight of largest electri... by wing-_-nuts on Thursday August 13, 2026 @12:04PM (#49288027)
>my energy company was trying to put load into its batteries at the times when the grid most needed it.

I'm not sure I understood this sentence?

Re:Heart aerospace completes first flight of largest electri... by toast0 on Thursday August 13, 2026 @12:28PM (#49288406)
Grid had too much production and needed somewhere to put it, so they paid the GP to put the energy into GP's car.

On an electric grid, Supply and Demand must meet. When demand is low, you either reduce supply or increase demand and sometimes it's easier to increase demand.

Also, if you're supplying electricity, you may have reason to supply it even when the wholesale cost is negative. If you have production incentives not included in the wholesale price, you can be profitable at negative wholesale prices. (Things like green incentives, or base load incentives, or long term supply price guarantees)

If significantly reducing your output takes time or causes operational difficulties, it may be sensible to deliver at negative prices as you taper off. If you have a fuel shipment inbound and nowhere to store it, the negative wholesale price may be less expensive than cost to deal with the storage logistics.

Re:Heart aerospace completes first flight of largest electri... by vlovich123 on Thursday August 13, 2026 @10:43AM (#49286739)
Yes, if you’re a battery in the system. Basically discourages generation because there’s too much supply. But this generally doesn’t trickle to consumers afaik.
Re:Heart aerospace completes first flight of largest electri... by testdelacc1 on Thursday August 13, 2026 @11:23AM (#49287404)
Easiest to understand with oil. During Covid the price of oil went negative. So you’d be paid if you bought that oil.

Sounds like a great deal right? But now you’re on the hook for receiving and storing that oil. That costs money, it’s not free. That’s why the price went negative - the seller was trying to offload and there were no takers at $0.

Re:Heart aerospace completes first flight of largest electri... by quickthrowman on Friday August 14, 2026 @10:04AM (#49298851)
Gas and oil need storage, if there’s too much supply and no storage, the price goes negative. This happened during COVID.