Re:Rear center fuel tank adds roughly 20k liters and extends...
by AYoung010 on Tuesday July 28, 2026 @08:10PM
(#49091724)
Presenting raw LLM output as your own writing in a human-to-human context is rude and antisocial, not to mention incredibly transparent.
Re:Rear center fuel tank adds roughly 20k liters and extends...
by lostlogin on Saturday August 01, 2026 @03:00PM
(#49137329)
I was oblivious - how did you tell?
There are a lot of commas.
Re:Rear center fuel tank adds roughly 20k liters and extends...
by inigyou on Saturday August 01, 2026 @03:06PM
(#49137372)
I didn't notice but this sentence feels like AI:
> Gate on a hot day, doors open, no ram air, warm soak: that's the worst case, and where the compressor has to work.
Re:Rear center fuel tank adds roughly 20k liters and extends...
by inigyou on Saturday August 01, 2026 @03:05PM
(#49137369)
Was once on a flight sitting at a gate with a faulty ground air connection or something, and they weren't allowed to run the APU at the gate due to pollution. It must've been 40 degrees (Celsius) inside, at Singapore Changi, and they were delayed at the gate too. Everyone breathed a sigh of relief when we started moving and got air conditioning from the engines.
The reason it stays a refrigeration unit and not just vents is the ground case. Gate on a hot day, doors open, no ram air, warm soak: that's the worst case, and where the compressor has to work. One published point-of-use chiller design specs roughly double the load on the ground vs in cruise (order of 700 W vs 300 to 400 W per unit). So the vapor cycle is sized for the ground, and most of a 20 hour flight is spent in the regime where you barely need it.
And these aren't fridge boxes at each cart. It's a central vapor-cycle chiller cooling a glycol/water loop piped to air chillers at the galleys; the carts get chilled air. The heat comes off the condenser and goes to ram air, a skin exchanger, the cargo hold, or back into the ECS, depending on the aircraft. Which one the new ULR units use, Airbus hasn't said. For a 22 hour flight the interesting number isn't peak capacity, it's efficiency and weight in cruise, which is probably what "lighter and more efficient for very long flights" is pointing at.