Re:Politician reads AI prompt during assembly
by big-chungus4 on Saturday July 25, 2026 @01:14PM
(#49049458)
Why exactly is that bad?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Politician reads AI prompt during assembly
by paulryanrogers on Saturday July 25, 2026 @01:31PM
(#49049647)
They care so little they don't even bother to proofread once, or lack enough intelligence to distinguish a prompt meant for a machine from a speech to inform/inspire/influence a human audience.
Re:Politician reads AI prompt during assembly
by ajs1998 on Saturday July 25, 2026 @02:01PM
(#49049973)
It's a red flag. Even if they agree and understand whatever they copied from chatgpt, they were too lazy to clean up its output. Are they also too lazy to read the news or does chatgpt summarize their articles too? AI people are like emperors without clothes. Totally embarrassing to witness.
This is bad because it's only getting harder to trust people. This is not someone I would want representing me. Although I'm not thrilled about any of my representatives anyway.
Re:Politician reads AI prompt during assembly
by nvme0n1p1 on Saturday July 25, 2026 @02:09PM
(#49050070)
You're absolutely right. Sure, I'll help you write a Hacker News comment explaining why politicians should have functional mental faculties and a coherent understanding of what they do during the course of their jobs and how their actions affect their constituents.
Re:Politician reads AI prompt during assembly
by big-chungus4 on Saturday July 25, 2026 @04:35PM
(#49051295)
None of that requires you to be a good public speaker or speech writer
Re:Politician reads AI prompt during assembly
by dredmorbius on Saturday July 25, 2026 @05:48PM
(#49051946)
You may have missed the joke that the comment you're responding to is written as if it were an AI response to your original question.
(I'm presuming it, and the other comments of this subthread, are humanly generated. Which may be being generous....)
Re:Politician reads AI prompt during assembly
by big-chungus4 on Sunday July 26, 2026 @08:12AM
(#49057346)
It was but I'm not sure what in my reply indicates missing it. The comment still made a point and I replied to it