Mining a 1993 game design for innovative game mechanics

Re:Mining a 1993 game design for innovative game mechanics by b0rsuk on Monday December 10, 2012 @11:18AM (#4899706)

I forgot Laser Squad Nemesis and Frozen Synapse. They have simultaneous turns, and in some ways it's the best of both worlds. You get the ability to plan moves carefully, like in TBS games, but don't get the time artifacts associated with them. Like in RTS games, time flows naturally. Try to distinguish between a shotgun and an automatic rifle in a TBS game. Good luck with that. The same thing is very easy in a game like LSN. I like to compare simultaneous turns to crossbows. Both inventions were very good and have their merits, but (in western world) they came too late to matter.

Also, Laser Squad Nemesis is a game designed by original X-COM's designer. It's from 2003, so and has nice high-res 2D graphics.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mining a 1993 game design for innovative game mechanics by scotty79 on Monday December 10, 2012 @05:59PM (#4902016)

Anyone fond of Lasersquad (XCOM and such) type games please take a look at the flash game "Mission in Space: the lost colony" http://www.kongregate.com/games/StormAlligator/mission-in-sp...

It has very nice mechanics. I especially like the unlimited shots of opportunity fire (well, limited by the ammo left in the clip) that allow for fun play while being hugely outnumbered.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mining a 1993 game design for innovative game mechanics by b0rsuk on Tuesday December 11, 2012 @07:25AM (#4904256)

It looks promising so far. The game actually explains mechanics to me is a good sign, it reminds me of Debian. Another interesting thing is separate action and movement points. I've been thinking about something like that. Basically the idea is you can move your legs separately from your hands.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mining a 1993 game design for innovative game mechanics by bitteralmond on Monday December 10, 2012 @01:20PM (#4900629)

+1 for LSN: back in '04 a friend of mine and I must have spent at least 50 hours playing nothing but the hotseat multiplayer of that game.

FS is also a lot of fun, but it just isn't as deep or complex as LSN. Fewer enemy types, less variety in level design. On the flip side, though, this means that most matches are over much quicker than LSN (a one-sided match often took 20-30 minutes, and hotseat games back in the day often took us an hour to finish!)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mining a 1993 game design for innovative game mechanics by jholman on Monday December 10, 2012 @10:21PM (#4902870)

Agreed about LSN and FS, as being interesting.

Crossbow too late to matter (you said "in the West", and my comments are likewise restricted), though... whatchu talkin' 'bout? Crossbows in Europe are over 2000 years old, so "too late" seems a little improbable. And they were the dominant ranged weapon in most of Europe for hundreds of years (roughly 1100-1500), so they totally mattered.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mining a 1993 game design for innovative game mechanics by voronoff on Monday December 10, 2012 @07:43PM (#4902486)

If you want to talk simultaneous execution games, the original computerized version is probably RoboSport, a 1991 Maxis game.

The mechanic is deep enough that it can still be fun to play a few rounds with a friend, despite the utter simplicity of the game.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mining a 1993 game design for innovative game mechanics by nooneelse on Monday December 10, 2012 @04:42PM (#4901673)

Laser Squad Nemesis is a great game. I remember spending too many hours learning and trying to properly implement the lessons of The Grenadier’s Bible.

[ Parent | on HN ]