News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What AI did to stackoverflow in a graph by Noumenon72 on Saturday July 18, 2026 @01:32PM (#48960211)
This is an example of a functional cultural trait -- question and answer style should not be larded up with irrelevant pleasantries and redundant signatures that waste time for everyone reading the question thereafter. They took the time to fix it for you and you should have assimilated.

This is different from closing your question and depriving you of an answer or making you feel dumb. It's just teaching you how to communicate professionally.

Re:What AI did to stackoverflow in a graph by sethops1 on Saturday July 18, 2026 @04:05PM (#48961785)
I put my name on my professional communications.
Re:What AI did to stackoverflow in a graph by no-name-here on Sunday July 19, 2026 @01:45AM (#48965319)
It depends on the medium - SO is closer to a wiki of questions, and Wikipedia has similar rules against pleasantries or signatures on article pages. (They do allow it on "talk" pages, and SO similarly has less restrictive rules in places other than their primary questions and answers.)
Re:What AI did to stackoverflow in a graph by zahlman on Sunday July 19, 2026 @11:53PM (#48974170)
When you submit a documentation PR to an open-source project, do you put your name (real, screen or otherwise) in the section of documentation that you add? No; you let Git put it in the commit history. (And if you have to discuss it, you put it in the discussion, or let a forum system such as GitHub's put it there for you.)

Stack Overflow is the actual document being worked on, not the discussion thereof. (That's why there's a separate meta.stackoverflow.com domain.) And analogously to the Git commit history, your name is automatically stamped onto your posts, along with a link to your site profile, in a box at the bottom of the post.

Re:What AI did to stackoverflow in a graph by znpy on Saturday July 18, 2026 @05:04PM (#48962380)
Communicating professionally and coming across as polite are not mutually exclusive.

Stackoverflow was not the K&R.