Re:SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites – fo...
by pastel8739 on Saturday July 11, 2026 @03:46AM
(#48869754)
I personally am _not_ used to seeing the sun after sunset and before sunrise.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites – fo...
by dnel on Saturday July 11, 2026 @04:23AM
(#48869999)
Neither is nature, this sounds like an environmental disaster waiting to happen
Re:SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites – fo...
by csallen on Saturday July 11, 2026 @07:04AM
(#48870913)
Solar panels aren't nature. Shining lights on solar panels is not going to be an environmental disaster.
Re:SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites – fo...
by jack_pp on Saturday July 11, 2026 @05:19AM
(#48870286)
considering plants grow just fine with grow lights, they don't really care. same with co2, they LOVE CO2
Re:SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites – fo...
by jurgenburgen on Saturday July 11, 2026 @06:53AM
(#48870828)
> they LOVE CO2
Plants can absorb some more CO2 and it improves their growth slightly but saying they LOVE CO2 is an exaggeration.
Re:SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites – fo...
by KeplerBoy on Saturday July 11, 2026 @07:41AM
(#48871159)
They turn it into sugar, what's not to love?
Re:SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites – fo...
by iamacyborg on Saturday July 11, 2026 @05:21AM
(#48870298)
Nature is more than just plants.