Re:SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites – fo...
by ericjmorey on Friday July 10, 2026 @10:25PM
(#48868019)
I've been watching satellites at all hours of the night for decades. You might want to double check with reality on that sunrise/sunset claim.
Re:SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites – fo...
by defrost on Friday July 10, 2026 @10:09PM
(#48867895)
You forgot about the radio spectrum pollution which affects the night and day sky right now .. and for the foreseeable future given the lack of progress in addressing that leakage.
Re:SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites – fo...
by BurningFrog on Friday July 10, 2026 @10:13PM
(#48867924)
The topic is seeing the night sky.
Re:SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites – fo...
by engineer_22 on Friday July 10, 2026 @10:26PM
(#48868020)
Parent might be talking about amateur radio astronomy which I agree might be straying from the main argument
Re:SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites – fo...
by defrost on Friday July 10, 2026 @11:06PM
(#48868312)
Professional radio astronomy - SKA et al.
eg: Scientists analyze 76 million radio telescope images, find Starlink satellite interference 'where no signals are supposed to be present' (2025)
~ https://www.space.com/astronomy/scientists-analyze-76-millio...
and the topic is Starlink (and other sat constellations) and their impact on the sky (visible and non visible).
Re:SpaceX wants to launch 100k more Starlink satellites – fo...
by BurningFrog on Saturday July 11, 2026 @12:11AM
(#48868655)
The message I responded to was about visible light:
"Will this be the last generation to remember the night sky?"
The night sky will be unaffected by satellites for the foreseeable future.