Re:GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra produces proof of the Cycle Double Cove...
by UltraSane on Friday July 10, 2026 @04:24PM
(#48864772)
If it was in Lean anyone could verify it instantly. That is the huge advantage of it. Manual math Proof verification labor might be the most limited resource ever.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra produces proof of the Cycle Double Cove...
by varjag on Friday July 10, 2026 @04:35PM
(#48864878)
How does it matter if it Lean verified or a human verified proof if you comprehend neither?
There can't be too many people working in that corner of graph theory, and I expect the result to them being eminently straightforward.
Re:GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra produces proof of the Cycle Double Cove...
by jackphilson on Friday July 10, 2026 @05:27PM
(#48865526)
One requires you to trust a human and the other requires you to trust mathematics.
Re:GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra produces proof of the Cycle Double Cove...
by varjag on Friday July 10, 2026 @05:31PM
(#48865577)
Let me simplify it for the sake of argument. Imagine I am unable to follow a middle school proof of Pythagoras. How does it matter if I trust anyone beyond that? What possible contribution can I build on top of that?