Re:GPT-5.6
by dahart on Friday July 10, 2026 @12:31PM
(#48862158)
> the models are quite literally stupid.
You’re arguing via reductionism, and failing to explain the outcomes and emergent properties of the “stupid” system. Humans are made of atoms that are quite literally stupid, so by all means, explain our intelligence and why it’s different than LLMs. (I’m not claiming LLMs are intelligent, BTW, I just don’t think your claim helps nor believe that you can fix it.)
Re:GPT-5.6
by daveguy on Saturday July 18, 2026 @07:10PM
(#48963376)
Seriously? Supid is literally incapable of learning. That is the underlying model. It does not change, therefore it does not learn. LLM models are quite literally stupid. No one gets a new model no matter how much they yell at it in the context.
Re:GPT-5.6
by dahart on Thursday July 23, 2026 @09:19PM
(#49030216)
It’s as if you didn’t read or respond to my comment. LLM models are capable of learning… it’s called training. Models do change during training. You seem to be fixated on today’s inference, perhaps?
You’re arguing via reductionism, and failing to explain the outcomes and emergent properties of the “stupid” system. Humans are made of atoms that are quite literally stupid, so by all means, explain our intelligence and why it’s different than LLMs. (I’m not claiming LLMs are intelligent, BTW, I just don’t think your claim helps nor believe that you can fix it.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductionism#Definitions