Re:Installing A/UX 1.1 like it's the 90s
by yjftsjthsd-h on Sunday July 05, 2026 @04:49PM
(#48797813)
The Toolbox ROMs, right? I can see the utility of using that (I mean, beyond that you might need to use it to boot), but why couldn't A/UX call those APIs itself? I can easily see where bootstrapping through Mac OS would be easier, but I can't immediately see why it would be particularly necessary.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
It's been a long time, but I'm pretty sure A/UX didn't use any of the toolbox roms and had it's own drivers (we had the source). A/UX booted from a MacOS partition because the Mac bootloader only understood booting MacOS (and it wasn't writeable with new boot code), so you booted to MacOS, then started SASH, which loaded Unix.
Re:Installing A/UX 1.1 like it's the 90s
by classichasclass on Sunday July 05, 2026 @05:09PM
(#48797967)
That's exactly the reason. NetBSD uses its own booter for the same purpose, for example.