News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google acquires BufferBox (YC S12) by Evbn on Friday November 30, 2012 @04:26PM (#4855545)
Amazon and Bufferbox did the sensible thing from the start: one time use access codes.
Re:Google acquires BufferBox (YC S12) by derda on Friday November 30, 2012 @05:10PM (#4855734)
Via email. Not very hard to hack.
Re:Google acquires BufferBox (YC S12) by abraham on Friday November 30, 2012 @07:46PM (#4856319)
If you email is hacked you likely have bigger problems than a package or two going missing.
Re:Google acquires BufferBox (YC S12) by ctz on Saturday December 01, 2012 @05:24AM (#4857299)
Email transport is done in plaintext on the public internet -- it provides no confidentiality or integrity.
Re:Google acquires BufferBox (YC S12) by AhtiK on Saturday December 01, 2012 @05:31AM (#4857308)
Most e-mail users are using browser-based e-mail clients over HTTPS so in order to access the plaintext email one needs to tap the senders local network which would only work if the sender is not using an HTTPS webmail. Plaintext public internet attacks for email were more common when people used unsecured POP3 and IMAP.
Re:Google acquires BufferBox (YC S12) by gabemart on Saturday December 01, 2012 @06:22AM (#4857389)
How long is the code? What happens if I approach a bufferbox in the middle of the night and try to brute force a TAN?
Re:Google acquires BufferBox (YC S12) by VMG on Saturday December 01, 2012 @09:05AM (#4857628)
Wouldn't be much of a problem with exponential backoff time and even a 6-digit pin.