News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Valid Email Addresses by dfc on Friday November 30, 2012 @02:43PM (#4855058)
"just because it is valid according to the RFC, doesn't mean that it's actually a valid user's email address."

I'm sorry but abiding by the RFC is the definition of a valid email address.

Postel said it best "be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from others."

Re:Valid Email Addresses by nthitz on Friday November 30, 2012 @02:54PM (#4855110)
Just because [email protected] is valid according to the RFC does not mean xyz.com is an existing domain name with a mail server setup that an account 'myname', let alone that user who inputted actually has access to that account. Just send a validation email
Re:Valid Email Addresses by dfc on Friday November 30, 2012 @03:14PM (#4855202)
You are confusing "valid email address" with "a valid email address, functioning mail server and user with appropriate credentials to access the system that processes email for the supplied email address."
Re:Valid Email Addresses by randallsquared on Friday November 30, 2012 @04:14PM (#4855485)
What you quoted was "valid user's email address", not "valid email address". While "valid email address" is arguable, a "valid user"'s email address is more clearly about whether it accepts mail. :)
Re:Valid Email Addresses by tbrownaw on Friday November 30, 2012 @02:54PM (#4855107)
A "valid" email address does not have to mean a "well-formed" email address.
Re:Valid Email Addresses by dfc on Friday November 30, 2012 @03:03PM (#4855153)
Without getting too existential what else could "valid" possibly mean.
Re:Valid Email Addresses by randallsquared on Friday November 30, 2012 @04:12PM (#4855476)
One that someone is using to accept mail.