News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GLM 5.2 Is Out by bxclltkfz on Saturday June 13, 2026 @05:35PM (#48521714)
What is nice about GLM is that they allow other providers that I can use on OpenRouter to filter providers that are US based and with zero data retention, unlike other open-weight Chinese models like Qwen.
Re:GLM 5.2 Is Out by phainopepla2 on Saturday June 13, 2026 @06:24PM (#48522102)
That's because Qwen's flagship models are not, in fact, open weight. Qwen3.7 Max, Qwen3.7 Plus and others are closed weight.

You can use Qwen3.6 35B A3B (for example) on Openrouter with a US-based ZDR provider, because it's one of their open weight models

Re:GLM 5.2 Is Out by re-thc on Sunday June 14, 2026 @06:00AM (#48525757)
> That's because Qwen's flagship models are not, in fact, open weight

They changed course when they fired the old lead and hired a new 1 from ex-gemini.

Re:GLM 5.2 Is Out by Alifatisk on Sunday June 14, 2026 @07:28AM (#48526228)
No, Qwen Max series has always been proprietary.
Re:GLM 5.2 Is Out by hadlock on Sunday June 14, 2026 @08:22AM (#48526531)
They also stopped releasing 100b+ model weights after firing him
Re:GLM 5.2 Is Out by treefry on Sunday June 14, 2026 @03:00AM (#48524849)
Unless you self host, zero data retention cannot be guaranteed.
Re:GLM 5.2 Is Out by tancop on Sunday June 14, 2026 @03:43AM (#48525077)
apples private cloud compute can get close, its still not 100 safe because backdoors and crypto breaks are possible but you go from trusting the data center operator with all their employees to only the person thats inspecting new hardware and giving out certificates (apple in this case). if some well known non profit like mozilla or isrg starts doing it with full open source software its like the best possible security
Re:GLM 5.2 Is Out by simondotau on Sunday June 14, 2026 @07:23AM (#48526199)
The handy thing about trusting Apple here is: you already were trusting Apple. I don't necessarily like that trust works this way, but that's just the physics of it.
Re:GLM 5.2 Is Out by illiac786 on Sunday June 14, 2026 @03:48AM (#48525105)
That is completely obvious, it’s like saying “100% security does not exist”.

I believe you are falling into the nirvana fallacy: No shades of grey, if it’s not perfect it’s as bad as the rest.

This is a very inefficient way of thinking as it is not possible to self host everything for most people, it just demands too much time.

Hence its is a perfectly valid approach in my opinion to looks at better (or, very often, “less worse”) SaaS solution.

If they states ZDR on a model, the likeliness of it leaking less data to some LLM data training is higher simply. If the business model of a company is built around a differentiator which is data privacy, that also significantly increases probability that data is not being leaked/sold.

It’s all grey, relative and about probabilities. Nothing’s perfect – another captain obvious thing.

Re:GLM 5.2 Is Out by ttoinou on Sunday June 14, 2026 @07:11AM (#48526131)
Yeah but how much higher chances ? Could be ver low
Re:GLM 5.2 Is Out by mlrtime on Sunday June 14, 2026 @05:27AM (#48525585)
Just like most things in life the guarantee it based on the entity/person providing said guarantee.

I can host a LLM in my basement and guarantee it, but would you trust me? Now you can say that you don't trust any company, but B2B relies on counterparty risk.

Re:GLM 5.2 Is Out by blurbleblurble on Sunday June 14, 2026 @08:12AM (#48526452)
Confidential inference gets us closer