News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:US bans differential privacy in Census data by airstrike on Saturday June 13, 2026 @12:21PM (#48518719)
How do you get the idea that migration is "planned"? You've lost the plot entirely
Re:US bans differential privacy in Census data by Dig1t on Saturday June 13, 2026 @04:17PM (#48521005)
The UN literally has a document on their website called "Replacement migration : is it a solution to declining and ageing populations?"

>https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/412547?v=pdf

You can find dozens of clips of politicians and billionaires also talking about the need to replace the low fertility population with immigration.

Re:US bans differential privacy in Census data by lkjdsklf on Saturday June 13, 2026 @05:24PM (#48521629)
Except that has nothing to do with voting which is the claim that was being made
Re:US bans differential privacy in Census data by throwawa1 on Saturday June 13, 2026 @07:10PM (#48522399)
It has everything to do with it. Some will receive amnesty (Reagan did it). Most will have kids, the kids will grow up with a different set of values and they will vote differently than native populations. They will vote outside of the national interest.

I am not talking about Republican or Democrat.

Whether English, Japanese, Australian, American, German, whatever the population being replaced with outsiders. Less unity, less cohesion and subject to whatever the whims of plutocrats may be.

What kind of mad man wants to see an Ireland with Irish? I don't want to live in Mogadishu.

Re:US bans differential privacy in Census data by Sabinus on Saturday June 13, 2026 @09:33PM (#48523321)
What would you do about the birth rate? How will you support the boomers retirement?
Re:US bans differential privacy in Census data by Dig1t on Sunday June 14, 2026 @02:33PM (#48530891)
Do what Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and China are doing: just let it fall, it will eventually bounce back. Boomers will be fine.

Replacing your entire culture and people doesn’t really fix the problem, it just permanently changes your country to be more like Africa, Mexico, India, etc.

Re:US bans differential privacy in Census data by airstrike on Sunday June 14, 2026 @09:55PM (#48535637)
TIL Africa is a country
Re:US bans differential privacy in Census data by Dig1t on Monday June 15, 2026 @04:24PM (#48546566)
I did not say Africa was a country..

>changes your country to be more like Africa

All of the countries in Africa, every single one, have a vastly lower standard of living than the USA.

Re:US bans differential privacy in Census data by throwawa1 on Saturday June 13, 2026 @03:03PM (#48520357)
One example is HIAS who runs a fully staffed Darién Gap facility. As soon as there is a friendly administration to mass migration - they just flip a switch and we will have 10 millions of migrants. I don't want to come across as MAGA, because I am a non voter - the Republicans fuel the fire with forever wars. Its really two sides of the same coin. Companies benefit, because when there is no social cohesion workers are less likely to Unionize.
Re:US bans differential privacy in Census data by cyberax on Saturday June 13, 2026 @03:46PM (#48520738)
"Tens of millions"? Really?

Even if we take 20 million, that's 75% of the total population of Venezuela or half of the population of Colombia. There simply are not enough people in South America for these kinds of numbers.

Re:US bans differential privacy in Census data by Dig1t on Saturday June 13, 2026 @04:28PM (#48521119)
Chuck Schumer:

>“We have a population that is not reproducing on its own with the same level that it used to. The only way we’re going to have a great future in America is if we welcome and embrace immigrants – the Dreamers and all of them, because our ultimate goal is to help the Dreamers but [also] to get a path to citizenship for all 11 million or however many undocumented there are here,”

Chuck Schumer, who is massively understating the number of illegals here, puts it at at least 11M. So yeah tens of millions is a realistic ballpark.

Re:US bans differential privacy in Census data by Dylan16807 on Saturday June 13, 2026 @05:39PM (#48521747)
That 11M represents decades of migration. It's not getting tripled with the flip of a switch.
Re:US bans differential privacy in Census data by throwawa1 on Saturday June 13, 2026 @05:53PM (#48521866)
12.2 million Mexicans live in California alone.
Re:US bans differential privacy in Census data by Dylan16807 on Saturday June 13, 2026 @06:05PM (#48521948)
Mexican heritage, yes. Mexican citizenship without US citizenship, very much no.
Re:US bans differential privacy in Census data by throwawa1 on Saturday June 13, 2026 @07:11PM (#48522407)
And 50 million never bothered to learn English? Here for decades? I have a bridge to sell you Dylan.
Re:US bans differential privacy in Census data by Dylan16807 on Saturday June 13, 2026 @07:51PM (#48522665)
The bridge is that 50 million number that just appeared, yeah. Where did you get that?

Is that the number of people that don't have English as their first language? Almost all of that group does speak English.

[dead]
Re:US bans differential privacy in Census data by vel0city on Saturday June 13, 2026 @06:55PM (#48522313)
> There are 45 million Spanish speakers in the United States - in 1950 there were effectively zero.

This is either a bald faced lie or demonstrates an extreme ignorance of history. There have been tons of Spanish speakers in the United States for a loooong time. Before Texas joined the United States, Spanish was an official language, as in 1837 a law was passed to ensure all laws were translated into Castilian.

> Be it resolved, by the senate and house of representatives of the republic of Texas, in congress assembled, That in justice to that numerous portion of our fellow citizens who understand only the Spanish language...

https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth45355/m1/99/

You think all these Spanish speakers just disappeared when Texas became a state?

You think there were also no Spanish speakers in the rest of the Western territories? No Spanish speakers left in the parts of Florida Spain originally conquered? No Spanish speakers left at all in the lands that became the state of California or Nevada or New Mexico?

> In 1980 the US was 95% white

More like 80% white. Even in the 1950s the black population was ~10%. If the black population is historically ~10%ish, how is the white population going to be 95% when we also break out other ethnicities? Strange how you're consistently overrepresenting white English speakers in your falsehoods. Interesting pattern you've got there.

https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d20/tables/dt20_101.20.a...

https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1950/...

> The root of all western Ethnic issues are Zionists.

Ah, I see now. Hunch confirmed. Makes sense about why you tend to lie in a consistent pattern.

Re:US bans differential privacy in Census data by throwawa1 on Saturday June 13, 2026 @07:32PM (#48522533)
A quick search says 89% in 1950. 10% were black. 1% were other.

Where did the Black slaves come from? They came from Zionist Slave traders. The slave traders weren't Christian. They weren't white. They were your people (A similar vein we see today in the exploitation of Children on Epstein Island - most were Zionist, every victim was Christian)

Zionists want mass migration because in the west because they are still pissed off at Rome for destroying their stupid temple, and their civilization. Not a lot has changed since Spain where your people were opening the gates to the Moors.

Whats great about the Gaza and Lebanon genocides is the whole world can watch your games. No one under 40 supports Israel. We are done.

Re:US bans differential privacy in Census data by vel0city on Saturday June 13, 2026 @11:07PM (#48523811)
> A quick search says 89% in 1950.

So you agree you hadn't even done a quick search before your previous comment. Good chance you haven't bothered actually checking any of your other facts in this comment as well.

> They were your people

German and Irish Catholics? "My people" (the ones I'm directly related to) enlisted with the Union soon after arriving, and their bretheren in the South were often killed by white Christian slaveholders in the US Civil War. But I guess you'll also tell me the US Civil War had nothing to do with slavery at all. Despite being white and Christian they were often persecuted at the time even in the North.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treue_der_Union_Monument

> The slave traders weren't Christian. They weren't white.

Absolute drivel completely divorced from easily looked up history. Even more disconnected from reality as "nobody spoke Spanish in the US" and "The US was 95% white in 1980". You should try doing a quick search on this "fact" as well. Many were white. Many were Christian. Not all, for sure, but many.

Re:US bans differential privacy in Census data by ptidhomme on Saturday June 13, 2026 @12:37PM (#48518891)
Someone must be funding the NGOs organizing it all.
Re:US bans differential privacy in Census data by airstrike on Saturday June 13, 2026 @12:56PM (#48519082)
George Soros, probably
Re:US bans differential privacy in Census data by mantas on Saturday June 13, 2026 @03:56PM (#48520820)
I wouldn’t be surprised looking at his historical track record of funding NGOs with specific angles and what he said.
Re:US bans differential privacy in Census data by airstrike on Saturday June 13, 2026 @07:13PM (#48522422)
it was a joke, to be clear
Re:US bans differential privacy in Census data by mantas on Sunday June 14, 2026 @06:29AM (#48525900)
In reality it’s not a joke though. Soros is one of the biggest politically minded donors of the last few decades.