Re:CRISPR Tech Selectively Shreds Cancer Cells, Including "U...
by lobocinza on Friday June 12, 2026 @11:27PM
(#48512619)
Utilitarianism can justify that kind of policy/behavior. It makes economical sense, with your free the burden of society it free resources so people be more productive, afford things, live happier lifes (at least on the material sense), have children.
Though I don't subscribe to utilitarianism or the notion that the value of an human being can be reduced to its economical aspects. It's not my moral compass.
Re:CRISPR Tech Selectively Shreds Cancer Cells, Including "U...
by consp on Saturday June 13, 2026 @02:11AM
(#48513909)
It is always interesting to point out to people claiming it would be better to not cure people that over half of the people in the room would be dead by the age of 5. That likely includes them.
Re:CRISPR Tech Selectively Shreds Cancer Cells, Including "U...
by golem14 on Saturday June 13, 2026 @07:39PM
(#48522582)
I think humour is the best medicine. EG, why not kill all the poor: https://youtu.be/s_4J4uor3JE
But on a lighter note: is there any belief more certain to spoil?? My god. Don’t underestimate the moral worth of futureYou, folks. I guess delighting in their assured regret is a bit of a guilty pleasure, but it helps!
RE:RFK, I think you’re indeed overestimating their intentionality. They intuitively feel that measles wouldn’t affect them because they’re stronger, and would do their best to dance around that belief if pressed beyond their comfort zone of cherry-picked facts.
But really, they’d much prefer to just not think about that part altogether IMO; ‘MAHA’ is much more about hypernaturalism & tradwives than it is about public health. This is all just annoying scaffolding to them.