Re:Anthropic apologizes for invisible Claude Fable guardrails
by sciencejerk on Thursday June 11, 2026 @07:39PM
(#48497916)
How do you think the Qwen and MiniMax models perform so similarly to Anthropic frontier models? What is your take then?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Anthropic apologizes for invisible Claude Fable guardrails
by _3u10 on Thursday June 11, 2026 @08:42PM
(#48498419)
Probably the same reason a Epyc 9965 from hetzner performs just as well as one from AWS for one tenth the cost.
Anthropic is offering a commodity product and trying to convince you it isn’t.
It’s even in the name, it’s a myth and a fable. Never happened doesn’t exist.
Also I believe at least on coding that qwen is now the frontier model, fable is its copy of frontier models. In the same way that the Ferrari Luce is an expensive imitation of a SU7 Ultra.
Re:Anthropic apologizes for invisible Claude Fable guardrails
by abletonlive on Thursday June 11, 2026 @11:12PM
(#48499452)
> Also I believe at least on coding that qwen is now the frontier model
The delusions people live in just to be a hater.
Re:Anthropic apologizes for invisible Claude Fable guardrails
by yeeeloit on Thursday June 11, 2026 @09:34PM
(#48498750)
China no. 1?
Re:Anthropic apologizes for invisible Claude Fable guardrails
by mcmcmc on Thursday June 11, 2026 @10:58PM
(#48499347)
They probably stole all the same copyrighted IP
Re:Anthropic apologizes for invisible Claude Fable guardrails
by jackjeff on Friday June 12, 2026 @03:21AM
(#48500913)
Well Anthropic did not ask for permission before they distilled copyrighted material.
At least the Chinese have the decency of giving back the model weights and not put BS censorship because “it’s too dangerous”.