cebert

If I needed that, I’d use a LLM.

It is frustrating and makes me close a lot of sites

It's disappointing that they couldn't have just left this feature in. If a few folks were using it and it was already supported, I don't see how it could have been that expensive for Amazon to keep offering it.

I don’t think they’re gonna be long for the world

> I refuse to take a repo with an AI-generated readme seriously.

Well, good luck in professional development then. Love it or hate it, this is the way everything is moving.

[dupe] This was discussed yesterday https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50224463

Right? I don’t know why anybody would trust this company for anything.

I appreciate the detailed analysis in this blog post. It highlights how the security landscape has changed. AI session logs need to be guarded and secured.

I don’t think it is safe under any circumstance to continue using API keys or any long-lived credentials at this point. The risk is too high.

I think it’s AI slop

This is unrelated to the posted article

How do you implement that with web apps?

Also, the site looks spammy. They want you to sign in just to read the blog post.

I mean, the last two presidents we’ve had in the US were cognitively challenged geriatric puppets. I don’t see how it could be worse.

This is old news at this point.

I would love it if Clay adopted a similar policy for the AI generated emails they enable GTM customers to spam people with.

Yes. It prevented me from reading, so I moved on.

I don’t get why anyone would pay for AI slop like this. You could build it yourself if you wanted something like this.

I find it ironic that this is a site dedicated to front-end development and it doesn’t render correctly on mobile devices.

I agree. I don’t find it interesting either.

Anthropic is doing some fascinating work. However, I find their communication style frustrating. It’s clear to me their employees have near unlimited token budgets. When Anthropic team members share their internal processes, I feel they don’t appreciate the constraints that many of us face in our work with budgets.

I doubt it

I was hoping that this would be an open weight model, but I understand why it wouldn’t be in Datadog’s interest for this to be the case when they’re trying to sell Bits.

I can’t wait till somebody figures out how to reverse engineer these with a LLM so we can just sync the scale data ourselves. I purchased one of these devices, but I am somewhat regretting my decision now.

I am not talking about ads within podcasts. When I am listening to an episode that I have in my library, I will get recommendations on other podcasts that I might like in the UI. Apple doesn’t give them the treatment that they are ads, but as far as I’m concerned, they are ads.

My only complaint about Safari is I wish Apple would fully adopt PWA standards on iOS. I believe they don’t want to because it would make the App Store less necessary.

> Apple (mostly) isn’t in the business of selling ads. I’d certainly trust this over most other options.

Do you not use the same Apple App Store, Apple Maps, and Apple Podcast apps I use? The ads are becoming a real problem.

Maps, the App Store, and the Apple Podcast apps are great examples of this.

It infuriates me that Apple Podcast slips in ads for podcasts I have no interest in as suggestions. As far as I can tell, there’s no way to disable that “feature”.

I am curious if anybody’s actually going pay nine dollars for this.