Policy on the AI Exponential

Re:Policy on the AI Exponential by kouteiheika on Wednesday June 10, 2026 @03:37PM (#48481502)

> AI companies that develop advanced AI models must have strong security standards that protect their model weights

So, basically, make open-weight models illegal. It's nice for Dario to come out and say this so explicitly.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Policy on the AI Exponential by simplyluke on Wednesday June 10, 2026 @03:54PM (#48481718)

Dario's been beating the regulatory capture drum for several years at various intervals, always in the name of safety, but it's hard to not see how self-serving it is.

I'm personally very tired of reading the linear-algebra-median of every AI safety essay from lesswrong with the inserted opinion of "therefore all my competitors, especially those pesky open source ones from scary countries should be illegal, only I can be trusted to not abuse the computer god that I definitely will have in just a couple more releases and with a couple more trillion invested"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Policy on the AI Exponential by raincole on Wednesday June 10, 2026 @03:52PM (#48481693)

People ask what the 'open' part of 'OpenAI' even means as they're a for-profit company.

It turns out it means 'opener than Anthropic.'

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Policy on the AI Exponential by inigyou on Wednesday June 10, 2026 @04:05PM (#48481859)

Opener Anthropic Imitator

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Policy on the AI Exponential by ed_balls on Wednesday June 10, 2026 @04:28PM (#48482199)

"We Have No Moat, And Neither Does OpenAI"

[ Parent | on HN ]