News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Are you still using a Vision Pro? by nickandbro on Tuesday June 09, 2026 @02:53PM (#48465799)
Waiting for Steam Frame.
Re:Ask HN: Are you still using a Vision Pro? by simjnd on Tuesday June 09, 2026 @03:41PM (#48466557)
Sadly the passthrough is black and white only. That's the one thing I love about the Vision Pro is it never feels claustrophobic thanks to very good passthrough quality.
Re:Ask HN: Are you still using a Vision Pro? by bananamogul on Tuesday June 09, 2026 @04:20PM (#48467110)
Wow, Steam Frame has only B&W passthrough...[1]

The Quest 3S has color passthrough and it's hardly an Apple-level device, and it's $349 in comparison.

I guess as a gamer, I don't care that much. I put on my headset to game, and if I need to step away for a moment, I'm more likely to take it off than to wander around my house with a headset on. Still, I thought color passthrough was now table stakes for a headset.

[1] https://www.pcgamer.com/hardware/vr-hardware/the-steam-frame...

Re:Ask HN: Are you still using a Vision Pro? by hgoel on Tuesday June 09, 2026 @07:46PM (#48469367)
IIRC there were rumors that the headset would have an open PCIe slot for such things to be added. Presumably they were passed on as defaults for cost reasons.
Re:Ask HN: Are you still using a Vision Pro? by starkparker on Wednesday June 10, 2026 @04:27AM (#48473202)
Not rumors: https://www.theverge.com/games/816118/valve-steam-frame-vr-h...

> The Frame’s four outward-facing monochrome cameras and IR illuminator seem to provide excellent tracking, though in a brief demo, the black-and-white passthrough view wasn’t useful for much except getting a general idea of my surroundings. Rowe says sticking with monochrome passthrough was an intentional choice because color passthrough would have added to the Frame’s price. “The core focus of the device is the gaming,” Rowe says.

> For those who want color passthrough and other changes to the headset, Valve has made its headset modular, including a dedicated expansion port in the nose piece designed to support extra cameras. The expansion port offers 2.5Gbps of bandwidth via MIPI and one lane of PCIe data.

Re:Ask HN: Are you still using a Vision Pro? by 3092-8121-9924 on Tuesday June 09, 2026 @06:28PM (#48468682)
I think it's not purely unmotivated cost-cutting. They went for IR sensors and have embedded IR LEDs for low-light tracking, and i figure colour passthrough would have required additional cameras.
Re:Ask HN: Are you still using a Vision Pro? by simjnd on Tuesday June 09, 2026 @05:17PM (#48467875)
Yes, same. I'll still get one because I think it being a standalone Linux computer is huge, and I'm so interested in the Proton / Lepton stacks to run Windows and Android games but yeah this is a pretty big compromise.
Re:Ask HN: Are you still using a Vision Pro? by daviding on Tuesday June 09, 2026 @03:14PM (#48466157)
Will be interesting to see which side of $999 it drops. I'll buy it regardless but the optics (heh) on the high RAM cost issue and the unit price might temper demand a bit.
Re:Ask HN: Are you still using a Vision Pro? by some_random on Tuesday June 09, 2026 @03:19PM (#48466231)
Does the AVP actually compete with it? I thought it didn't do games?
Re:Ask HN: Are you still using a Vision Pro? by daviding on Tuesday June 09, 2026 @03:31PM (#48466446)
It does local stuff of course, and some are trying to bring PC streaming to it, e.g. https://github.com/Kross82/KRVR-releases
Re:Ask HN: Are you still using a Vision Pro? by NetOpWibby on Tuesday June 09, 2026 @03:06PM (#48466009)
Ooh share results here when you get it!